As America prepares for another election, which happens to be the most important election in history, the punditocracy grapples with the specter of whites entering the identity politics game. This is not desired by the regime, which is why there has been educational indoctrination and media messaging to emphasize repeatedly that this is a bad thing for whites to do. Racial coordination is bad for whites, but good for all others.
The brainwashing is working, as it appears higher status whites would rather commit voting suicide by pulling the lever for the Third World flood to continue, rather than possibly stem the tide. What exactly was the tide meant for with America? “Good food,” is the only thing a SWPL can say, and it is not stupidity that limits them to this. Actual benefits are strategic or economic, which they cannot grasp, and one big unmentionable item: One Man, One Vote, One Time.
From a strategic point of view, there is a defensive weapon that exists to protect the empire by being open borders. Leftists will not admit we are an empire that dominates the globe, but any empire must fend off challengers. By leaving our borders open, defense against rising threats is easier. By using the system of higher education and post-education material security, America can pull in the best and brightest out of other nations and prevent their home nations from applying the human capital to their social and economic systems. An anecdote one may hear often starts with a Nigerian or Pakistani pre-med undergrad student saying he or she wants to become a doctor and go home to help their people. The anecdote ends with the storyteller finding the Nigerian or Pakistani on LinkedIn living in Long Island, or the suburbs of Atlanta.
By the late ’60s, the American economy was not as overwhelmingly dominant as it was after the Allied bombings of Japan and Germany, which created the American middle class by destroying competition. The American labor force could extract raises, and as John Kenneth Galbraith wrote in the ’60s, capital would seek automation as much as humanly possible. The way immigration comes into play is that while free trade allows for the offshoring of work that is simpler, more complex and location-dependent work would need to be automated or made cheaper. America’s open door with regards to immigration, both illegal and legal, sucked in labor to reduce costs and make American businesses more competitive, while boosting returns to capital. Immigration also feeds into social service needs, new consumers, and with the birth of the FIRE economy, new marginal borrowers.
This is beyond the average SWPL’s grasp. This is also only a benefit to capital, as the millions of laborers in America would be harmed. Even if they did understand it, admitting they are foot soldiers for international capital would short circuit their wiring as they politely sidestepped the coalition members that shared their anti-Brexit heartache: immigrants, SWPLs, and multinational corporations and finance. Without that knowledge or admission, they run into the only other benefit which is an unmentionable: importing voters.
The racial lockstep voting of modern America means that outcomes are merely calibrations of the ethnic composition of the electorate. There is no debate when all percentages are predetermined, and America is rapidly, if not already, at a predetermined 51-49 (or worse) outcome. This inevitability is hinted at in gloating essays by liberal law professors on the future erosion of 2nd amendment rights. The goal of third world immigration is to create the one man, one vote, one time situation that so much of decolonized sub-Saharan Africa witnessed. It is possible LBJ realized it would be easier to bribe the black underclass and import impoverished “Future-Americans” than to persuade whites. Looking at the insurgent, anti-status quo campaigns of Donald Trump and Sen. Bernie Sanders, it is evident that the American regime has a much harder time controlling its white population than it does minorities. Clinton won due to rigging primaries with the DNC’s help and the Democrats being just beige enough to carry her in several states.
This is the goal for the Left in order to lock down every election. If one wonders why the mask slipped in recent years, it may be due to the Left assuming they had stuffed America with enough imported voters to secure the presidency forever and had conditioned whites enough to vote “I’m no racist!” to prevent a backlash. Even if Trump is elected and has some success, forget about a blue Texas. That will not matter. Once Florida is Mexican enough to be reliably blue, it is over. One man, one vote, one time will take place. The GOP — if it exists after 2016 — will fight a rearguard action, but at best they can delay the inevitable.
A one party state will exist overtly. As the one party state becomes explicit, all that matters is what the Left wants to tolerate. Does open borders immigration finally end? Does the Left accelerate all of their maniacal anti-Western Civilization and anti-White fringe rhetoric? Does disparate impact get applied to criminal prosecutions? Does political conflict descend into open violence? Will white America accelerate its heroin despair and depress their fertility below German levels? Do America’s whites and Hispanics come to a truce and power-sharing system of sorts? This is wide open.
Even in a one party state, there are factions. The factions and battles move from the national debate stage to backroom party control. Those party leaders will all go through the proper credential programs via Harvard, Yale, etc., which we are oh-so-close to now in America. American democracy by that point will have become a true U.S.S.A. If the Democrats of 2016 are a preview, the Bernie-Hillary contest was neoliberalism vs. full communism, which blacks overwhelmingly rejected, despite being in line with their ideological aims because they were clients of the faction running Clinton. Power plays existed in the Politburo and in the Chinese Communist Party. Xi is purging his rivals after all, not only the corrupt.
With a party securely in control, would policies change to guarantee more safety, order, and possibly the return of segregated living and Jim Crow, but with a smiley, progressive face? A future media glorifies “All-Black Safe Spaces!” The Austro-Hungarian Empire suffered separatist movements and parties for decades, and with ethnic bodies far closer than what 21st century America contains. With the ends finally secure in one man, one vote, one time, the progressive project can unravel, due to the collateral effects of its means.