Podcast (weimerica-weekly): Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: iTunes | Android | RSS
Welcome to Weimerica Weekly Episode 25. The podcast airs every Wednesday.
This week’s podcast is on the split in the Democrats and how it reaches even the lowest races.
Weimerica Weekly is a podcast hosted by Ryan Landry that touches on the cultural, political and sexual topics that fill the mindspace of our United States of Weimerica. The politicization of all cultural and social degeneracy is examined with a focus on how it fits together.
Weimerica Weekly is produced by the Hestia Society and distributed by Social Matter.
Related Show Links:
Wikipedia entry for a state representative from a tiny little town in Maine.
“Just Like Us” Department: HIV Sex Roulette parties spotlighted in the media. Chemsex subculture on the rise.
Thanks to G.W. Rees for the introduction and outro music. G.W. Rees’ music can be found here on Soundcloud, Youtube, Facebook, Flickr and Instagram.
Sponsorship:
If you are interested in sponsoring Weimerica Weekly, e-mail Ryan Landry at Mrossi34228 at gmail dot com. Sponsorships start at $10 an episode, and all proceeds will either go back into the podcast or provide some compensation for your most grateful host.
Weimerica Weekly
Or subscribe with your favorite app by using the address below
It is really interesting to watch the Democratic Party infighting. A lot of it is not good-natured and the worst insults that have been hurled by the Clintonistas towards Bernie Sanders have been comparisons of him to conservatives.
For instance, on a pro- Hillary Clinton thread at the Daily Kos titled “What Does Bernie Want. A Fight. Let’s Give it to Him!” the poster states:
“I’ve written skeptically of Bernie Sanders for months. I wrote a diary 2 months ago sounding the alarm about Bernie’s attempt to launch the equivalent of a ‘palace coup’ at the Convention, using a tenacious approach to apply maximum pressure to manipulate the delegate selection rules to overturn the results of the primaries/caucuses and win the nomination. Many, including Clinton supporters, dismissed it, but after the Nevada state Democratic convention and Bernie’s combative responses, people are taking seriously the possibility that Bernie will not go quietly or go at all.”
Also:
“Any win by Clinton is dismissed as somehow illegitimate. Any win by him is a sign that the revolution has arrived. Math be damned. Will of the voters be damned. Dealing with Bernie Sanders and people like Jeff Weaver is no different than trying to have a rational argument with a tea party member who does not accept President Obama’s legitimacy. No matter what is said, his response is like that of South Carolina Congressman Joe Wilson who inexplicably, viscerally and uncontrollably interrupted President Obama’s State of the Union speech with the phrase “You Lie”. That’s Bernie Sanders’ temperament in a nutshell. It’s just wrapped in a Democratic socialist world view.”
And interestingly, on how to take Sanders down:
“Utilize Elizabeth Warren to not only continue her attacks on Donald Trump, but also to speak on progressive issues and shift focus away from Bernie’s crusade for power to align the progressive movement to the policy agenda which is within our grasp to achieve. That agenda is aligned to HRC’s (Human Rights Campaign) and the party’s agenda. Bernie’s view is increasingly pessimistic and cynical that government can work absent revolution. That’s not a governing philosophy for a successful political party. Elizabeth Warren is Bernie Sanders without the socialist revolutionary baggage. She is an optimist about government and the political process. He is not.”
I am also convinced that the Democratic Party will never prefer to nominate a straight white male to the presidency again. Like many of the police chiefs and school superintendents around the country, the U.S. Presidency is now seen as a permanent diversity hire.
Agree on never nominated a white man ever again. This is because they have practically scourged white men from their party.
Yes. It was amazing to see the anachronism Jim Webb up there in the first debate. It reminded me that the Democrat Party, at one time, might have actually represented the people, instead of being the party of criminals, welfare loafers, confused eunuchs, freaks, morons, illegal aliens, self-loathing whites, bums, etc.
Excellent show, Rysn. Sound of Music adaptation very triggering.
[corrected version of previous]
Appreciate your comments about homosexual depravity and the “Just like us” canard.
Enjoyed the “favorite things” song parody but…
Ironic juxtaposition, considering Trump’s own atrocious record on “LGBTQ” degeneracy:
http://americansfortruth.com/2016/01/22/trump-called-for-adding-homosexuality-to-the-1964-civil-rights-act-in-2000-interview-with-gay-magazine-the-advocate/
Incidentally, I wonder if you aware that there are at least some outspoken homosexual dissidents who have actually denounced the vile act of buggery (anal penetration) itself. Bill Weintraub, for example, whose web site, http://man2manalliance.org/ (graphic content), contains what are perhaps the most ardent, compelling and comprehensive expose`s of the hideous realities of the vile, dangerous act of buggery and the culture that surrounds it that I’ve ever seen. Another brave dissident homosexual I am aware of is blogger Rob Mc Gee ( http://funfrotfacts.blogspot.com/ , http://throbert.blogspot.com/ ). In contrast to Weintraub, McGee is not unequivocally against buggery, per se but is highly critical of its centrality in male homosexual culture and the way that alternatives such as frot are marginalized and belittled. Also, McGee might very well appreciate your podcast and would probably feel at home on the Dissident Right in general; a self-described conservative, he is delightfully iconoclastic and has praised John Derbyshire.
Such men, themselves unapologetically homosexual, are attacked, marginalized, silenced and vilified by the entrenched, buggery-promoting “Gay” establishment and ignored by their heterosexual enablers.