Born in 1954, Jean-Claude Juncker is perhaps the most powerful and profligate quasi-technocrat in the world. Hailing from Luxembourg, he is currently the president of the European Commission. To put it bluntly, not much happens within the gilded cage of the European Union without his say-so. What a day it truly is when almost all of Europe lines the pockets and follows the whistling pipe of a man from Luxembourg.
Concerning the huge geopolitical insanities of the last few weeks with an unexpected tidal surge of immigrants from all over the Mediterranean South, flooding into Europe via rickety boats or directly through the Balkans to Hungary, Juncker is an important player. In a recent debate over the issue, he produced these gems:
“It is not time to take fright, it is time for humanity and human dignity.”
“We are talking about human beings, not numbers.”
“We have the means to help those fleeing from war, terror and oppression.”
“The fundamental right of asylum is one of the most important international and European values. We should not forget that.”
It’s clear from rhetoric alone, Mr. Juncker is the architect of the internationalist left’s maneuvering in response to this crisis, and they couldn’t hope for anyone better positioned to carry forward their objectives. While Juncker can be defied by European countries with strong leaders who have more to lose at home than abroad, most of the countries in question will do what they are told with some arm-twisting, something which the European Union has become adept at executing.
Let’s consider the current situation in Europe. While much has indeed been said of ‘Eurabia’ and the growing Islamic population, this is only a growing sub-faction of an overall trend, which many are keen to ignore, namely that of the ‘de-whitening’ of Europe. White natives have become minorities in many large cities across the northwest of the continent, from Malmö to London. This is due to a combination of factors, such as continuing porous borders facilitated by unhindered intra-European travel, higher birth rates among minorities, as well as white flight from urban areas which have become inhospitable and known for their roaming gangs and child sex rings.This served as the driving force behind the resurgence of so-called ‘far right’ parties in Europe after the recession of 2008. Economics didn’t have much to do with it in most cases. The thing is, the European elite have managed to keep a lid on this phenomenon.
Then the migrant crisis hit. All of a sudden a flood gate had been opened, a few boats capsizing on their way from Libya to Italy became something akin to the Grand Jihads of the 700s. After helping to plunge the Muslim world into yet more turmoil by toppling aged dictators, Europe had never given migrants from the region a better reason to head north. To put this in perspective, more than 350,000 migrants crossed the EU’s borders in January and August 2015, compared with 280,000 for the whole of 2014 (this is only counting those who were detected), and it likely the numbers for September will exceed that. The Greek island of Lesbos has been taken over by immigrants who proceeded to set fire to the entire island. Hungarian train stations are packed with ‘refugees’ heading to Germany and Austria. The port of Calais has seen trucks swarmed by those bound for the UK.Before this incident, it was likely that, policies unchanged, Europeans would begin becoming minorities in their own countries as early as 2050 in some cases. This influx will rapidly accelerate the timeline, and as the immigrants destroy cities and ransack the treasuries of countries like Sweden, the specter of Europe’s far right will return. This is why in Greece, despite the arrests, Golden Dawn remains the third most popular political party. It is why Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban has hardened his anti-immigration policies to stave off the rise of Jobbik.
So, how do the elites play this? Through incrementalism and heavy propaganda, they have managed to retain power and stifle their enemies, teaching the whites of Europe that immigrants bring ‘vibrancy’ to the country and that ‘diversity’ is a strength. See London’s opening ceremony for the 2012 Olympics if you don’t believe me. But this strategy cannot work when the velocity of degradation goes into overdrive, and no ‘heartbreaking’ stories about children washed up on the beaches or Turkey, or immigrants rotting in the back of a cargo truck are going to change that calculus. It was perhaps the poll showing that the previously negligible Sweden Democrats were now the most popular party in Sweden which spooked Juncker and his cabal, and so they have decided to go ‘all in’.
Nigel Farage of UKIP made an astonishingly perceptive claim recently: “This is important for Mr Juncker and his friends because as the European Union loses popularity with its electorates, what better way to prop up EU support than vast numbers of first generation pro-EU migrants. It is all reminiscent of what Blair did in Britain and exposed why Labour are so strong in London”The plan is quite literally to overwhelm the electoral system with people who would rely on institutions like the European Court of Human Rights to prevent them being deported later by right-wing governments, who would consider their statuses illegitimate. It’s a cynical ploy, but we must consider its implications. The elite of Europe are Liberal first and white second, clearly. As long as their cult perseveres, they are willing to do the most despicable things to their countrymen. Rest-assured, the people running Britain do not care in the slightest about the Rotherham rape scandal. After all, they have been covering up their own similar escapades since the 70s.
The incremental approach is bad enough, but an assisted hostile takeover of Europe by plundering immigrants, most of whom are young men, will be catastrophic. However, the first strategy is infinitely more wise on the part of our enemies. The smart thing to do would be to close down the borders , let migrants drip in, and have the time-frame run as previously planned so as not to arouse suspicions, and certainly not attack geopolitically insignificant countries like Slovakia for instituting a Christians-only policy. As has been already discussed though, Liberals are high time-preference ideologues. If given the choice between results later and results now, they go for results now and nothing inhibits them because their cult gives them no reason to care for evil, racist white people.
This said, Juncker is racing against a clock. He knows individual national border controls, cascading in Austria, Slovakia, and the Netherlands will not stop the wave. You need to have resolve to keep out something this big, and so far only Viktor Orban of Hungary has shown anything approaching the steely will needed to have border agents shoot invaders, or sick Jobbik’s Magyar Garda on them.
If Juncker can pour enough of these migrants into European countries, they will never break free of the Eurocratic yoke, short of civil war or a Russian ground invasion. He is trying to secure this before any of his vassal states find their own Orban, whether that is Nikos Michaloliakos in Greece, or Matteo Salvini in Italy. What is unclear is how successful he can be in this effort as protests against government inaction mount. At this critical juncture we may finally witness the Liberal high time-preference display its fragility. If not, white Europe west of Budapest is finished.
The EU was on a path to almost inevitable breakup before the migrant crisis, but this makes me adjust my odds back in favor of the EU slightly because if enough nationalists win elections in proximity (time) they might find the EU useful as a tool for achieving nationalist gains (Orban for EU President).
Civil war will break out in a Eastern European country. In most of the countries, Islamists and Gypsies will not associate with one another, but there will be one where they will work together. That uprising will be beat, but not easily. Then the genocide trials will start.
The EU is never going to change it needs to be removed. Europe is going to Fall to Islam. Which will mean ISIS will win. Maybe Russia & China will see that as a thread & Liberate Europe.
Something interesting to consider with regard to demographics: most non-leftist media reports bring up the mostly male composition (~70% seems to be the consensus) of the teeming hordes invading the continent at the moment. While these people certainly represent a threat, a mostly male group will find itself diminishing rapidly within a generation, given the limits on breeding when females are scarce. Granted, this assumes Europe actually defends its own women against the aforementioned invaders, something to which they’ve so far not shown a predilection, but a few violent incidents and I can see attitudes changing fairly rapidly. Properly accounted for, this factor could be decisive in a struggle I imagine will last more than a couple generations.