I mean, “gay marriage,” who comes up with that shit? Thousands of years of human history and suddenly we’ve got “gay marriage?” Do you think Joe Sixpack was sitting on his couch one day watching the game, and he scratches his beer belly, and says, “I know! Let’s let the fags get married!”

Nope. That idea came from the product of our finest institutions. Our cognitive elite. The movers and shakers of society. We already have an aristocracy, and this is what they come up with. In the words of John Derbyshire, “we’re doomed!”

With all this said however, your overall analysis is correct that democratic majorities voting in elections or referendums have decided very few key social changes, and this goes for the entire Western world, not just the United States. But we should remember the people who do make the decision, the elites, are often placed into their position via democracy. Obama is where he is today because of an electorate. The SCOTUS looks the way it does today because of Obama who is where he is because of the electorate. Democracy is a great engine for getting horribly incompetent and evil men into power, because rather being under the scrutiny of an aristocratic class, these candidates are under the scrutiny of idiots, the masses, made worse by the fact that women and ethnic minorities are included in those masses.

Elections do not decide policy direction, but they do decide the quality of the ruling class, and in almost all instances, they give rise to the worst possible candidates for such offices, both directly and indirectly. A democracy will never provide the kind of leaders that monarchy provides. Princes study to rule. Presidential candidates study to campaign.

Voting does not matter to the elite. It barely registers. It doesn’t even slow them down. The “voters” are inconsequential, hapless, and unable to change anything even with massive popular majorities on certain issues.

Elections tend to work like this: voters get riled up about issue X. Candidates are elected that support X. When a majority of these candidates are seated then several months of obfuscation, gobbledegook, and misdirection occur, and then lo and behold, legislation Y is produced. Y is not X. It may be the exact opposite of X. Or it may not be related at all to X. So the voters are left scratching their heads going, what is this Y? What happened to X? And the media and politicians go blah blah blah we needed Y blah blah blah. And then, to top it off, pundits get mad at the voters and blame them for Y. You voted for those candidates, they cry. It’s you voters fault we have Y! And the voters all shrug and say “but we had no idea Y was even on the agenda!”

The ruling class has its own agenda. The voters don’t matter. The immigrants are here more to destroy our culture and the ability of hard working natives to reach the middle class. The immigrants are not needed for their votes. Elections don’t matter and they have never mattered, except to serve as obfuscation of the underlying agenda and a distraction to the mass of people.

All scenarios of white defeat depend on the US government and its vassal states suppressing any effective self-defense by whites, even as its white supporters are being raped and murdered by the diversity they profess to love. The government will splinter, its money will become worthless, and non-whites will either starve to death in their urban ghettos or wander into rural areas and quietly disappear into unmarked graves and dog stomachs.

It’s as silly as Nouri al-Maliki thinking, “Once those American troops are out of my way, I’ll purge my government of Sunnis and crush their people once and for all!” Oops.

http://www.johndenugent.com/white-south-african-tragedy/

Our disgusting and depraved media have buried these stories, barely reporting them so as not to disrupt the narrative that all atrocities are white in origin. If they widely publicized what would have been met with tremendous outrage just 80 years ago, they know there would finally be reprisals in white countries. But no, it’s all about Trayvon Martin of course.

You’d hope so. It seems a given that at least in some Western European countries, the possibility of Zimbabwe-like retributions against whites by swarthy minorities adhering the religion of peace is extremely high when the demography scale finally tips. In America, large portions of the country will inevitably become unlivable for whites, forcing either an exodus of whites overseas or the clustering of whites into protectionist city states. All of this division is highly positive for the end goal of dismantling the current elite. Eventually it spills over from useful election tactic to widespread violence and mayhem. We might summarize this line of thought by saying that the current policies are wonderful for the Democrat Party’s prospects, but awful for democracy’s prospects.

I would definitely agree the jubilation over whites becoming a minority, coupled with the repeat humiliation of particularly white males by the advance of feminism and sodomite rights, has allowed for an inroad by groups like TRS and AmRen. Something like #cuckservative just wouldn’t have been possible even at the height of Tea Party anger in 2010. Now it is. This isn’t to say that Conservative whites are joining a clarion call blasting their trumpets, but behind the scenes they are whispering that the ‘far right’ have a point. They don’t want their kids to suffer what South African whites have suffered, babies wrapped in newspaper and burned alive, 12 year olds forced into boiling bathtubs after their mothers are raped repeatedly in the next room.

It is perhaps the case that Reactionaries in general are not hammering home this point forcefully enough. Whites don’t want to become neo-nazis or skinheads, but they are ultimately becoming more fearful and are running out of places to turn. I honestly can’t see huge difficulty, in the event of a general collapse, to install an authoritarian government somewhere. The intellectual and theoretical groundwork is amazingly strong at this point.