<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hail To The Tyrant!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/</link>
	<description>Not Your Grandfather&#039;s Conservatism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isaac Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/#comment-17482</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isaac Lewis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=2277#comment-17482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plato said the tyrant&#039;s ruling principle was passion -- quite an apt description, if you think of modern tyrants like Mao or Stalin who were notorious womanisers and (at least in the case of Mao) into artistic expression too.

(Plato&#039;s other rulers, from best to worst, were the military timarch ruled by honour, the oligarch ruled by love of wealth, and the democrat ruled by freedom.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plato said the tyrant&#8217;s ruling principle was passion &#8212; quite an apt description, if you think of modern tyrants like Mao or Stalin who were notorious womanisers and (at least in the case of Mao) into artistic expression too.</p>
<p>(Plato&#8217;s other rulers, from best to worst, were the military timarch ruled by honour, the oligarch ruled by love of wealth, and the democrat ruled by freedom.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Cathedral Is Democracy - Social Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/#comment-16201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cathedral Is Democracy - Social Matter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=2277#comment-16201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] see how this is so, let’s look back at the first democracy: Athens. As I discussed before, Greek city-states were initially ruled by aristocratic republics. These republics were controlled [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] see how this is so, let’s look back at the first democracy: Athens. As I discussed before, Greek city-states were initially ruled by aristocratic republics. These republics were controlled [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horus</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/#comment-14549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Horus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 09:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=2277#comment-14549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lydia was also called Sfarda or Sparda by the native Lydians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lydia was also called Sfarda or Sparda by the native Lydians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Citadel</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/#comment-14545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Citadel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=2277#comment-14545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A tyrant seems then very similar to a warlord, that is one who can enforce his political rule only by the material means at his disposal and not from loyalty of the people. For this, in the long term it seems tyranny is not entirely stable or at least it shouldn&#039;t be without factoring in some other dynamic at play. Divine right had problems in Greece because their theology was not very advanced in the sense of its political relevancy. As compared with other theologies that existed in the Middle East and elsewhere  and were very well suited to autocratic rule, the Greeks lacked this. See Egypt for example.

Yes, the people do wish for righteous government. This I think, can never be forgotten by anyone who supports autocracy. It must be a bedrock principle of the successful autocrat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A tyrant seems then very similar to a warlord, that is one who can enforce his political rule only by the material means at his disposal and not from loyalty of the people. For this, in the long term it seems tyranny is not entirely stable or at least it shouldn&#8217;t be without factoring in some other dynamic at play. Divine right had problems in Greece because their theology was not very advanced in the sense of its political relevancy. As compared with other theologies that existed in the Middle East and elsewhere  and were very well suited to autocratic rule, the Greeks lacked this. See Egypt for example.</p>
<p>Yes, the people do wish for righteous government. This I think, can never be forgotten by anyone who supports autocracy. It must be a bedrock principle of the successful autocrat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordian</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/06/22/hail-to-the-tyrant/#comment-14505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2015 15:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=2277#comment-14505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can certainly praise the great tyrants or their latin counterparts, the Republican dictator, but the philosophic tradition irrevocably assigned the moral meaning to those words as in The Republic and The Politics.  A tyrant is a ruler who is a slave to his passions.  If we want to talk about these ancient concepts in a contemporary sense, we need a new rhetoric and a new paradigm of power and authority to describe it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We can certainly praise the great tyrants or their latin counterparts, the Republican dictator, but the philosophic tradition irrevocably assigned the moral meaning to those words as in The Republic and The Politics.  A tyrant is a ruler who is a slave to his passions.  If we want to talk about these ancient concepts in a contemporary sense, we need a new rhetoric and a new paradigm of power and authority to describe it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
