Comments on: The Next Media Cycle To Expect After Trans*

By: Mark Citadel

Mark Citadel — Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:53:42 +0000

I’ve spoken on NGO’s in the past. They are truly the vermin nests that need to be fumigated. Notice that recently the Hungarian prime minister kicked all foreign NGO’s out of the country. NGO’s should be more accurately terms CTO’s – Cultural Terrorist Organizations. It is madness to let, especially foreign groups, come in and try to forcibly engineer the culture.

By: Mark Citadel

Mark Citadel — Tue, 23 Jun 2015 08:41:31 +0000

Well, now we have reached the dizzying heights of trans-racialism which is guaranteed to play havoc with Affirmative Action, there is nothing to say poly and indeed pedo aren’t next. The thing about pedophilia is I doubt they will have any kind of similar campaign. The subject is too noxious. However, what we are seeing already is a growing acceptance of the practice among the elite. There’s no need to mass market it to the masses when they can rape children at TV studios and gay pool parties in Hollywood (as the X-Men director did). Part of me feels however that always in the common man’s mind, even if he doesn’t realize it, he knows this isn’t right. He might be friendly to a sodomite co-worker and support the ‘right to marry’ but in his head he privately thinks “this person is lesser than me, he’s had to fight to get what he wants because he doesn’t deserve it”.

That seed that exists in the minds of common people I believe will be the ultimate downfall of the sexual minority revolution. Let’s be honest, these people are freaks. You only have to look at their behavior to see they belong in mental hospitals. Given the proper conditions and incentives, it will not be hard to turn people against them.

By: Neoreactive

Neoreactive — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 23:43:57 +0000

“Great Apes” – for a moment there I thought I had been redirected to ovenworthy.com

By: IA

IA — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 23:26:05 +0000

Thanks for the link. They target traditional values under the guise of “rights.” Oddly, they single out Great Apes as a the only other group besides LGBT to have “rights.” Does this mean goats, camels, dogs, lions, tigers, armadillos, etc., have no rights? Maybe Great Apes are more human and can be included in a chain of rights.

By: Anon49

Anon49 — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 20:04:43 +0000

Media cycles are downstream from elite NGOs, which are downstream from their donors. Watch for strategy docs like this to know the SJW future: http://www.arcusfoundation.org/what-we-support/social-justice-lgbt/

By: August

August — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 14:28:49 +0000

Whenever I think about this subject, I think about bootleggers and baptists. The example of bootleggers and baptists shows the weird alliances that happen in politics- both bootleggers and baptists are against legalizing- the bootleggers like their profits and the baptists like being against alcohol.

Well, in all cases regarding state marriage, the bootleggers are lawyers. The progs are moralizers, after a fashion, so they are the baptists, and they won’t be able to get poly done, because the lawyers won’t want it. Multiple partners mean multiple claimants, and that means less money for the divorce industry. Marriage will stay monogamous just like in Roman times- because that’s how you maximize the number of divorces, and the amount of court enacted redistribution of money. You will very likely be able to marry a goat in a few years, because the courts can benefit from that, but it is doubtful we will ever see polyamory in law.

By: Neocolonial

Neocolonial — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 10:57:15 +0000

While any, possibly all of these will come to pass, I think you’re missing the big one.

In the next generation, it will become acceptable to kill those who oppose any of this.

By: Neoreactive

Neoreactive — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 05:01:58 +0000

I’ve thought for a while, and admit lots of people have thought I’m mad for thinking this, but the evidence keeps stacking up, another potential reason for these ludicrous expansions on the definition of marriage is to widen the net of possible men to be enslaved in the child support scheme. Hear me out, prior to the sexual revolution access to women was regulated and expensive, and a man had to commit for life to gain access. The state played a very small role in it, if at all. After the sexual revolution access to women was made cheap, practically free, but the consequences of it (single mothers, out of wedlock births, parenting, child care, and the welfare of women in old age with no husbands) was outsourced to the government. So the government had to claw back those costs. Hence higher taxes for everyone, but also child support.

In Australia, we have a welfare budget of about 20 Billion, of which about 5 billion comes from child support annually. So the more men who can be caught up in this, the better for the government. Look at it this way, for a father who provides for his family, where is the benefit for government? But a father separated, and with his money regulated via federal agencies, and distributed out to the various parties, a clip here, and percentage there, and the state can even go ‘cap in hand’ to the executive for more funds for their “crucial work”.

Broken families are a win/win for progressives and rent seekers alike.

By: Orthodox

Orthodox — Mon, 22 Jun 2015 02:32:04 +0000

It isn’t a matter of being accepted. Most gay men do not accept gay marriage, nor do straight men. Yet here it is. There is no logical reason not to have polygamy based on the arguments from the gay marriage debate. To be logically consistent, one must support it. All it takes is one sympathetic media case, which the TV writers can cook up in droves.

By: Laguna Beach Fogey

Laguna Beach Fogey — Sun, 21 Jun 2015 21:49:31 +0000

OT: Who are those ogres in the photo? I find them vile-looking, and yet, at the same time, they resemble most White Americans I encounter these days.