Comments on: How Progressives Purge Corporate Cultures

By: vxxc2014

vxxc2014 — Thu, 07 May 2015 11:59:57 +0000

Excellent. The ballot box* is the biggest idiot distractor. So it is, even bigger in terms of our serfdom than the Television.

Mr. Citadel,

Get rid of the obstacle of conservatives as first order of business. Well then one rids oneself of one’s only asset of numbers. Better to move their views into the cold sunlight of truth, even if it means moving the Overton window Right. If you mean the GOP certainly one should lose no chance to point out they’re a captive oppostion. The chief problem with the conservatives is they conserve nothing.

*I’m constrained to point out elections do matter very much in terms of the present struggle for these offices: Local *Sheriff – who controls among other matters jails and is the directly elected law enforcement and in the current struggle Sheriffs are emerging as the American peoples champions, and the local *Mayor who controls the municipal police. If you elect a mayor who’s Police Dept isn’t yet under DOJ supervision then your police answer to their neighbors. If you elect the current mayor of Baltimore you have a creature who’s entire governing effort since election has been to subordinate the police to DOJ. You see in her own words Rawlings was lobbying for DOJ to take over Baltimore police dept long before the riots. Annaopolis refused to overturn MDs 1967’s LEBOR [Law Enforcement Bill of Rights] at which point it was a matter of waiting for the next black to die at Law Enforcements hands.

These details matter. If Gray has died in Baltimore Detention we’d have never heard of it, they’ve bent the knee to DOJ and are supervised. Same as NJ – NJ bent the knee in the 90s and can enforce the law therefore as needed.

Thank you again for the excellent essay.

By: Ivan .M

Ivan .M — Sat, 18 Apr 2015 19:40:06 +0000

Are we to believe, then, that private enterprise can only be ignoble when holiness is the political currency?

By: Henry Dampier

Henry Dampier — Wed, 15 Apr 2015 03:44:17 +0000

Thank you.

‘Private’ is not all that private in the US. Owning a company means that you need to act as a deputy of the state in many functions — from diversity enforcement to tax collection.

By: EdwardM

EdwardM — Wed, 15 Apr 2015 01:24:32 +0000

“…people on the right tend to prefer to delude themselves that they’re not in the weak political position, that they’re not an unrepresented mass with poor influence over the elite which actually runs the country and owns most of the capital.” That is because it is part of the mythology of the Progressives that it is they, not the marginalized Right, who are the noble underdogs heroically punching upwards against an oppressive Establishment, and it is this mythology which is assiduously propagated by the Progressive-dominated organs of opinion, to the extent that even the Right is led to believe it, regardless of how far removed it is from reality. This tapestry of delusion is starting to fray, but there are still many, many ordinary people for whom it constitutes unquestioned “truth.”

By: Mark Citadel

Mark Citadel — Tue, 14 Apr 2015 23:43:34 +0000

Succinct and useful as usual Dampier. Surely the first obstacle for Reactionary critics of the order is getting rid of the controlled opposition, the Conservatives who so clownishly fail to do anything worth a damn. I mentioned with regard to the Indiana RFRA debacle, what is it exactly that Conservatism could have achieved even if they had stood on some kind of principle? The government were not the aggressors in that scenario, it was private businesses that boycotted and private individuals who sent death threats to the pizzeria.

How does Conservatism tackle that in any way? Oppression by private forces is often even more gratuitous than by a kangaroo court. Conservatism cannot address the problem because it cannot be authoritarian. Give me even a poor authoritarian king over any of these weasel politicians with nothing to offer any day.