Comments on: A Patriarchal Restoration Theory

By: jay

jay — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:48:41 +0000

”IQ differences. Neuroscience of the sexes.”

Both done. But the IQ differences have been obfuscated:
http://atavisionary.com/how-standardized-testing-undervalues-men/

By: jay

jay — Wed, 25 Mar 2015 01:45:46 +0000

”We should be seeking ways to bootstrap our way up and out of this dilemma by finding other ways to build and strengthen communities. Ways that evade the state in its eternal quest for control. I believe Phalanx is an attempt to bootstrap by forming a fraternity/mannerbund with which to build everything else. Also Sarah Perry’s recent writings on ritual and community has been an excellent attack on the problem, I hope you guys have been following them.”

I agree a community needs 1st a mannerbund. A band of brothers that support each other:

https://radishmag.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/the-way-of-men/

Not only will those men defend the perimeter but the bond between brothers would serve as the basis from which community is built and patriarchy is built and sustained further strengthening the community.

By: disenchantedscholar

disenchantedscholar — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:34:35 +0000

Insulate the people who call for these suicidal policies (as they are anti-community). Example: make feminists/socialists pay for their own policies. If a policy is announced, it must be explained where this money will come from and how much each. Revoke all victim cards and legislation including “hate speech”. This is achievable with proper hope to dangle as carrot.

By: disenchantedscholar

disenchantedscholar — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 21:29:35 +0000

Fund certain lines of research;
IQ differences.
Neuroscience of the sexes.
And most important of all, the health damage caused by The Pill. This is the feminist’s secret weapon. Also, study feminists and activists overall, compared to the normal population, especially what becomes of them later in life. This would plug the numbers of new recruits.
Turning off the money tap of NGOs would help somewhat.
How many of us are in STEM, maybe you could do a survey of readers?

By: xaver

xaver — Tue, 24 Mar 2015 20:04:56 +0000

The path of the muslims, mormons, amish, orthodox jews, hutterites, etc. is the only option that is likely to work. Marriage isn’t just a financial institution, it needs a community to support it. Since women tend to be protected from financial disaster it doesn’t really act as an incentive for them. The best incentive for women is the fear of social ostracism. Women are far more enmeshed in the social fabric than men, as can be seen, for example, in the disparity of defection rates between young hutterite men and women.

Ultimately its a chicken and egg problem, we need patriarchy to have strong communities and we need strong communities to have patriarchy. We should be seeking ways to bootstrap our way up and out of this dilemma by finding other ways to build and strengthen communities. Ways that evade the state in its eternal quest for control. I believe Phalanx is an attempt to bootstrap by forming a fraternity/mannerbund with which to build everything else. Also Sarah Perry’s recent writings on ritual and community has been an excellent attack on the problem, I hope you guys have been following them.

By: Hadley Bennett

Hadley Bennett — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:57:57 +0000

This recent article from Lion certainly proposes an interesting prediction, re: the future of Israel. Very interesting. The basic idea is that as support for Israel becomes an even-more-significant cleavage issue between Republicans and Democrats, Israel’s fate will become increasingly up in the air. This is because Israel depends on the U.S. for its existence, and also because the Republican Party has the Reverse Midas Touch. Every issue they touch is an issue that loses.

https://lionoftheblogosphere.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/how-to-predict-the-future/

By: Mark Citadel

Mark Citadel — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:19:35 +0000

I have cited Kaufman’s work in my own article ‘The Ranks of the Extreme Riseth Now’. Israel will be the first Modern secular country to demographically flip to a majority ultra-religious country, that is unless it is flooded by the remaining Jews of Europe.

He who breeds wins.

By: Valkea

Valkea — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:20:35 +0000

Notice also that it is the objective of the liberals to divide men and women, to break and poison their relations. Traditionalists should aim to repair the damage done to the relations of men and women, not making the relations worse, thus helping the liberals’ cause.

By: Valkea

Valkea — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:57:42 +0000

There were several good points and one very bad one:

“I would compare it (VR) to “male birth control. Large populations of intelligent men will leave the dating scene as soon as high-quality VR appears. They will have little reason to struggle with dating brainwashed feminists when they can obtain any “10” they want for sex on a high-definition platform, preserving real-life women as platonic friends. This will reduce female dating value dramatically.”

That reminds me of defending ones country with a threat: “If you attack, we will shoot ourselves to the head!” According to that scheme large populations of intelligent men will not procreate, removing them from the gene pool, and leaving only the less intelligent to procreate. With that you can kiss any advanced civilization hopes goodbye. Whatever the situation, intelligent traditionalists first goal must be to form good White marriages and have many children. Also the opposition between men and women is exaggerated. Women are psychologically pliable; their political views, morals, sexual preferences and frequencies, goals, worldviews etc. have a tendency to become modified according to the views and tastes of her man / husband. Traditionalist man actively and goal-orientedly, but subtly and gradually shapes his woman according to his views and goals. Traditionalist writings should encourage this process and teach how it is done, how a liberal woman is turned into a traditionalist woman. Also the traditionalist writings should create inventive ways how to bypass, neutralize or invert the liberal system’s anti-family landmines.

By: IA

IA — Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:13:49 +0000

Thanks for the link to the Harvard/Kaufman paper. It vindicates my thesis that modern liberalism believes in nothing, equality especially, and is blatantly about will to power.

The modernists’ contempt for european people (and culture) is laid bare. An amazing document. Almost insane in its malignancy.