Weightlifting and the Threading of Needles
Written by John Glanton Posted in Uncategorized
My father is getting on up there in years, early sixties to be exact, but he’s in enviable shape for his age. Just last September, for instance, I saw him paddle a kayak for a couple miles against the wind on a choppy lake without taking a breather, and it didn’t get the best of him. He hikes with his dog regularly. And he’s got that proverbial old man strength in his hands, which you can witness any time he picks up a tamp bar. To my knowledge, the last time he lifted weights or even had a dedicated workout regimen was in his college football days. Mostly he “gets his exercise” from his job, which is blue collar and demands daily manual labor. (And also from his habit of repairing to the great out of doors whenever he has a free weekend, which I alluded to above.)
I, on the other hand, am your garden variety gym bro. There’s nothing in my day-to-day life that necessitates a whole lot of physical activity. I get in my truck and drive across town to what amounts to a desk job. I can laze around there all day if I want to, eating pork rinds out of the vending machine, lifting nothing heavier than a briefcase. At home, likewise, there’s very little I have to do that requires a significant expenditure on my part. But I do exercise regularly. My father stays fit because the normal contours of his life require a certain level of fitness from him. I stay fit because there are several hours of my week that I compartmentalize and set aside to spend in my gym moving weights.
I used to think that, when Christ said it was easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, he had uttered some esoteric spiritual truth. Nowadays, though, it strikes me as a plain and unvarnished observation about how people behave when they experience any sort of plenitude. Maybe I’ll stay on the weightlifting wagon. Maybe I’ll fall off. (I’ll confess that I quit working out for a long stretch after I got married. But that’s really just another illustration of the point I’m trying to make: folks generally do what the exigencies of their life—such as the instinctual drive to pair bond—require. But not much beyond that.) The fact of the matter, though, is that falling off the wagon wouldn’t kill me, or even really materially harm me in the short term. If a laborer like my father quits laboring, however, his livelihood would begin to suffer almost immediately.
In other words, the bodily health of people like my father is organic in a sense that the health of people like me isn’t. It emerges from the circumstances of their life, whereas for ours it is either tacked on or it is not there at all. There are analogues in almost every facet of the modern’s—and even moreso the Millennial’s—experience, I think. Many of the people whose lifestyles no longer include exercise of necessity simply let themselves go. They drink beer and binge watch Netflix in the evenings. They get skinnyfat and wake up at forty on the road to cardiac arrest. In the same way people whose lifestyles no longer demand that they put forth cognitive effort, and precious few do in any compelling sense, often forgo it, let their faculties atrophy, sink into the popcorn-brain confusion of social media stimulation and push-button entertainments. The pageantry of the world passes them by and they comprehendeth it not. There are other analogues as well. Those who don’t need community ties for survival don’t forge them. They subsist on a “significant other” and the occasional office party. Those whom the grocery feeds never learn to produce food. Those who don’t need children to care for them in their dotage don’t have them. And thus all those relationships and pursuits that have been our satisfactions since deepest antiquity, the ancient health of man, go unnoticed by the wayside.
This observation, when you boil it down, is essentially just a paleo critique applied more broadly than our dietary needs. But I think it might do us well to ponder occasionally how “rich” our lives are compared to the norm of almost any historical people. And thus, paradoxically, how difficult it is for us to be righteous, to be complete. Perhaps we are those who laugh now and only later shall we mourn and weep. Perhaps we are those that are full and we shall yet hunger. Perhaps, despite an embarassment of luxuries and provisions and security, we still struggle to enter the kingdom of God, to be at peace with ourselves, because it takes efforts over and above the quotidian demands of our lives to prevent essential aspects of ourselves from dissolving gradually into obsolescence. It would certainly be a cosmic irony if that were true.
Usually, shameless propagandist that I am, I try to end my weekly offerings here with some sort of moral of the story, some take-home point. I’m not sure I have one this time around. I think it would behoove us to keep in mind that the material triumphs of the contemporary West ought to be scrutinized as much as its spiritual failures, so that we can attempt to account for and adjust to them. That might do us some good. But really this is just one of those thoughts that occasionally crosses my mind between sets of deadlifts, when I am out in my detached garage, surrounded by all manner of plates and bars and other implements, attempting to maintain a baseline level of masculinity that is entirely irrelevant to my current survival needs. At moments like those I pray that God teaches me and you and all of us to live whole and upright lives—in a world that in some ways attempts to bulldoze us over and in others doesn’t even offer us the resistance necessary for growth.

Fantastic post John, one of your best. Reminded me deeply of my father who is nearly 58 and has been working out consistently his entire life and has never looked better.
He showed me pictures of his buddies from high school a few months ago. I was astonished at how young he looked in comparison. The fruits of a consistent exercise regimen.
Excellent, excellent post.
Allow me to come in with an assist on the take-home point.
The failure of modern society to promote healthy lifestyles in the masses is damning. A government which allows its people to degenerate physically to their current state is not worthy of power.
How should a government manage the health of the people? How would a neoreactionary government differ from what we have now in terms of managing food supply, promoting physical activity through urban design, building a culture that venerates health, etc.? This is an important question within the larger framework of providing a viable alternative to the status quo.
Excellent post btw.
I appreciate the compliments. And yours too up there, Caleb and Jonathan.
You’re definitely right that the powers that be fundamentally don’t care about the health of the man on the street and that he can eat shit and die for all they care (the perfect description of adult onset diabetes, by the way). It’s one of those wicked problems, though. Is there a way to have wealth and prosperity without having some level of degeneration of the populace across the spectrum. What *would* an enlightened government do? Is it a problem solvable by government in the first place? Important questions indeed.
Nicely put and very true. We need to rethink the concept of human rights. The whole idea has corrupted and weakened us. Nothing in traditional western culture concerned itself with this aberration caused by excessive wealth.
Forcing people to be “good” by taxing them against their will is insane. The recipients are not grateful while those who “care” cannot exercise compassion because they are being compelled. Normal white men are viewed with contempt as weaklings for caving to threats of violence. On the one hand people addicted angrily demand their “rights,” while on the other they are reduced to acting like children who must be placated by politicians seeking the line of least resistance.
Natural hierarchy is upended. Boys can no longer establish their position in the world through normal “bullying.” Aggression is normal in healthy boys. Attempting to pervert human nature produces an ever more violent reaction. In a sane society, aggression would be tempered by communal rituals that bond young men, initiating them into manhood, both sexually and spiritually. No women allowed. The thwarting of ritual also prevents a communal sharing of a foundation myth.
Absolutely agree. The struggle to “attempt to maintain a baseline level of masculinity that is entirely irrelevant to my current survival needs” is a significant factor in maintaining our spiritual and cultural equilibrium. I think the ultimate failure of urban-centered NRx thinkers is how they accept the materialist and neo-Platonist paradigm of modernity which emasculates us and deprives us of half our being. We are not disembodied “rational minds” floating around in meat sacks. Our body and mind are an organic, integral, whole. I like how you compared lack of physical fitness to lack of mental fitness; these things are fundamentally related! Just as our body and soul exist in essential unity, our health is a unified concept, both physical and mental. Just as our minds require problems to stay strong, our body requires labor. The alienation of labor is a significant problem under modern liberal thought, but the answer is not Socialism, the answer is traditionalism, or returning to the healthy laboring habits of our ancestor.
The beginning is easy. Fire the illegal Mexican who does your house, buy a manual-propelled lawn mower, and cut your own grass. Find more ways to demonetize your life by replacing hirelings with your own labor, and strike two blows against the Left simultaneously.
I tend to agree that a healthy mind and body are connected. But, you have to explain why the opposite is associated with liberalism. I don’t see this in gentrifiers who are all feminists or gay whiners. They are hugely into yoga, bike riding, health foods, meditation, etc. Activist gays in particular work out religiously to advertise that they are AIDS – and other disease – free.
It’s not just healthy body, but a healthy orientation towards labor as a way of life. Liberal economic and political thought alienates labor by treating it like something to be avoided, and therefore as something bad, and leisure as something good. This creates Marx’s famous “alienation of labor,” wherein the worker is placed in a position of spending 40+ hours a week doing something he is told to despise.
While Marx’s solution is wrong, the problem is real. If we understand labor through the liberal paradigm, we must necessarily hate one of our natural functions, ie. to work. On the other hand, we acknowledge that the mind is made in order to think, therefore we should also acknowledge the agrarian principle that the body is made to work. Traditional societies do not maintain this distinction of labor and leisure, but rather like the Greeks may distinguish business and leisure, ie. public money-making labor and private non-monetized labor. (This is not universal; antebellum Southern culture, esp. the hinterlands, maintains no such distinctions at all, hence the stereotype “lazy Southerner” who mixes work and play) Labor is central to the traditional way of life because it is integrated into the person’s lifestyle rather than alienated from the life and segregated to M-F 9-5.
The things you listed as part of the gay/gentrifier lifestyle promote a healthy body but retain the unhealthy attitude toward labor inherent in liberal thought. Just like Marx promoted the Soviets as replacements for the community, urban leftists promote these replacements for labor. My position is that replacements are nearly always inferior to the authentic deal.
Eye of the Needle was the smallest gate in Jerusalem’s wall. Camel could go through it only when kneeling. Thus the parable of Jesus means that rich man has to kneel before God, put God first in importance order, and wealth to some distant lower position.
Modern life is full of fake superstimuluses that displace real things. E.g. one beetle species’ males try to copulate with certain thrown away orange colored cans, because that orange is brighter than the orange in the back of female beetles, which normally attracts the male beetles. Social media displaces real life social relations and families; porn or paid sex displaces sex between man and wife or between lovers; media lies and distortions displace truth, and in general media illusions displace reality; processed and raffinated junk food laden with artificial ingredients displaces real food; sport displaces meaningful work that keeps people fit; artificial, manipulative and in many ways from mans point of view empty and meaningless city environments displace natural environments, their sceneries, surprises, hardships, obstacles, struggles, discoveries, delights, comforts, versatilities, freedoms, etc.; music videos or New Age -humbug displaces religion and life in a congregation; etc. Although superstimuluses often displace the real things, they leave men mostly fundamentally and inexplicably unsatisfied, weakened, bored, compulsive and half-dead, feeling meaningless and depressed. To counter these feelings and states people often try to intensify and increase the number of superstimuluses, which only makes the negative spiral worse. Ultimately only the real things give deep satisfaction, vigorous mind and body, fulfillment and meaning.
We must lift weights to save the white race
Comfort is the biggest enemy we face.
Why should people worry about anything when things are good?
Perhaps things just have to get worse for people to care and for the value of the traditional way of life we speak of to become more important. Until it does it will exist amongst the few who seek it out.
Many are happy to just bumble along as long as they still have hot showers, Mcdonalds, Hollywood, and Breaking Bad to watch.
Recent Posts
Facebook
Post-Anathema
08/30/15
Friends
The Future Primaeval
Henry Dampier
Mitrailleuse
A House With No Child
Sydney Trads
Recent Comments
Archives