Weekend Material: Watch Predator (1987)
Written by David Grant Posted in Uncategorized
On this, an occasion of no particular significance, let us pause and revisit one of the great achievements of modern drama. In an age when technology is demonized and environmentalism exalted, there remains at least one last shining example of Man overcoming nature. I speak, of course, of Predator (1987).
The plot is straightforward: sent into the Central American jungle to kill some generic rebels, Arnold and company succeed spectacularly only to find themselves stalked by a mysterious alien Predator. In the end, only Arnold survives the creature’s attacks, and he defeats it by covering himself in mud and crushing it with a tree.
At first blush, this film might seem almost anti-technology: the most skilled of human warriors, armed with the most modern weapons, prove powerless before a powerful extraterrestrial with fancier gadgets. The Predator is superior to humans in every way a hunter can be: it has longer and sharper claws in the form of its ray-gun; its camouflage makes it supremely stealthy; even its physicality is superb, allowing it to move through the trees with incredibly stealth and speed. Arnold’s own technology avails him not at all, as he is reduced to employing arrows, spears, and booby-traps against his foe.
What in fact allows Arnold to triumph is a fundamental difference between him and his adversary. The Predator is just that, a predator, a natural hunter who uses its own nature-given assets to achieve its aims and never thinks or acts beyond them. Arnold’s companions are of the same mold; they have their weapons and their skills and nothing else. Their relationship with their environment is animal: they accept what is given and simply pass through, leaving everything except their prey exactly as they found it.
Arnold is of a different sort; he manipulates his environment to his own advantage. When attacking the guerillas, he sends one of their vehicles crashing through their camp. When pursued by the Predator, he constructs a complex trap. In preparation for the final showdown, he pulls out every trick he has, building weapons and traps of various sorts and creating his own form of camouflage out of mud. Arnold, in short, possesses technology in a way that no other character in the film does, and that is what allows him, weak earthling that he is, to defeat a powerful alien. He is no mere predator; he is human.
The Predator recognizes in Arnold something alien. Its dying words—a recording of Arnold’s question, “What the hell are you?”—express its perplexity at what has just happened to him. It cannot understand how such a weak creature managed to overcome it; it cannot grasp the meaning of technology.
The next time that you watch Predator, do so with new eyes. You are witnessing an eloquent expression of what allows Man to rise above the beasts of the field. It is Man’s technology, his ability to subdue nature and craft an environment more suited to his needs, which allows him to survive and thrive. Invite your environmentalist friends to a private viewing and explain to them: this is why we have nice things.

The mud-smeared image of Arnold defeating the technological alien by turning the jungle upon it seems emblematic of the opposite of what you’re arguing. Arnold is only capable of defeating it when he abandons the technology he came with. Reliance on that tech killed all the other commandos.
I’m a big Arnold fan and I love finding symbolism in his films even if it wasn’t intentionally written in. Perhaps “master of nature” is the best way to describe Arnold’s role. Reliance on complex technology is what got the Predator killed. Arnold used mud.
“Master of nature” is the nature of technology. The problem is that his companions (and the predator) used the technologies they came with without thinking and simply acted. Arnold thought; he planned; he overcame; he INVENTED.
Arnold displayed creativity. That’s what David tries to tell us.
Besides, the alien Predator was too self-confident. He was also too prone to take delight in the critical moments, just like a cat hunting mice. The Predator spoiled its best chance. (That’s the scriptwriter coming to the rescue of the main character.)
I’ve noticed a certain similarity with the asymmetrical war in Vietnam. Low-tech creativity vs. the high-tech US military.
Oops, the link was wrong.
Take a look at this: Vietnam War booby traps
I wonder what the significance of the Indian scout’s “sixth sense” is?
The scout can sense the Predator, IMO, because they are similar. The Indian is a primal savage, as close to a human version of a Predator that there is. And what does he do?The scout deliberately strips himself of his gear -accouterments of the modern, civilized soldier- and walks out into the jungle to confront the alien with only a primitive, traditional weapon. Fire vs fire, primal vs primal. The Predator of course makes quick work of the Indian.
Arnold on the other hand, works and plans an ambush for the creature and slays it. Is it significant that Arnold’s character’s name is “Dutch”? I think there is symbolism in the film; fighting fire with fire, like the Indian did, fails. Barbaric man cannot master the fury of nature. Dutch can, because he holds civilization.
Arnold is about as Germanic a character as you can get: an Austrian actor playing an American named Alan “Dutch” Schaefer.
Right, Dutch represents the “civilized white man”, the tamer of the wilds.
Technology is a doubled bladed weapon, one can turn that weapon against a Predator if you understand it’s strengths and weaknesses. This gives the civilised man the edge of precognition, seeing the Predators next step before it takes such step, being able to feint, forcing the predator into self inflicted error. An intelligent civilised man will use his position of weakness as bait, then mould his environment of choice into strength and out right advantage.
This is what it means to be a Predator of a Predator.
When “Dutch” realised by mere luck of the mud saving his life, that there was the beginning of the end of Scorpion face, he experienced it’s strength, competence it ability in acquisition of his comrades, now he knew it’s weakness.
Slightly embarrassed about the source, but this might resonate: http://kmansadventures.proboards.com/thread/8870/thoughts-on-fighters?page=1&scrollTo=88377
Recent Posts
Facebook
Post-Anathema
08/30/15
Friends
The Future Primaeval
Henry Dampier
Mitrailleuse
A House With No Child
Sydney Trads
Recent Comments
Archives