<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Impossible Thoughts Possible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/02/24/making-impossible-thoughts-possible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/02/24/making-impossible-thoughts-possible/</link>
	<description>Not Your Grandfather&#039;s Conservatism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vxxc2014</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/02/24/making-impossible-thoughts-possible/#comment-11140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vxxc2014]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=1633#comment-11140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Generally you&#039;re right.   However what is being proposed matters. 

Also - Swords seem to help per the picture as well as all of human history. 

Ideas don&#039;t matter on their own.   They don&#039;t.   They require force behind them, and force must see it in their interest and that it&#039;s possible.  As opposed to impossible and likely to be opposed by overwhelming force mostly from their own camp.   I am of course speaking of monarchy in particular, however in general the 20th century has had quite enough novelty.    Just in case another novelty is proposed.  Novelty killed 200 million in the 20th century, I think everyone&#039;s had enough exercise.   

Under pressure atavism works, and the most common sense solution is to restore to the last working system.

A completely novel form of government, in particular one that&#039;s utterly against their interests and indeed goes against 1200 years of known English limited and subsidiary rule  as well as all of American History will at best produce a sigh and rolling of the eyes.  At Best. 

What we&#039;ll end up with is a government of limited and subsidiary rule, not utterly unlike what we&#039;ve had since the English began to record their governance in writing [which probably means well before] and not utterly unlike what we would have now had our elites not vanished in overnight 50 years ago and handed us over to the insane, evil and congenitally criminal.  

The system of government that most of Europe and Russia has now is not dramatically different than what they had 100 years ago, except for horrific damage ...caused by Novelty.   

I must respectfully decline any novelty.

However I do applaud you for however reluctantly shouldering whatever burdens Sir you seem to be bringing yourself around to doing...Bravo.   If only we had a few more like you our troubles would pass sooner and with less damage. 

Bravo, I mean this sincerely.    Good luck in your endeavors.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally you&#8217;re right.   However what is being proposed matters. </p>
<p>Also &#8211; Swords seem to help per the picture as well as all of human history. </p>
<p>Ideas don&#8217;t matter on their own.   They don&#8217;t.   They require force behind them, and force must see it in their interest and that it&#8217;s possible.  As opposed to impossible and likely to be opposed by overwhelming force mostly from their own camp.   I am of course speaking of monarchy in particular, however in general the 20th century has had quite enough novelty.    Just in case another novelty is proposed.  Novelty killed 200 million in the 20th century, I think everyone&#8217;s had enough exercise.   </p>
<p>Under pressure atavism works, and the most common sense solution is to restore to the last working system.</p>
<p>A completely novel form of government, in particular one that&#8217;s utterly against their interests and indeed goes against 1200 years of known English limited and subsidiary rule  as well as all of American History will at best produce a sigh and rolling of the eyes.  At Best. </p>
<p>What we&#8217;ll end up with is a government of limited and subsidiary rule, not utterly unlike what we&#8217;ve had since the English began to record their governance in writing [which probably means well before] and not utterly unlike what we would have now had our elites not vanished in overnight 50 years ago and handed us over to the insane, evil and congenitally criminal.  </p>
<p>The system of government that most of Europe and Russia has now is not dramatically different than what they had 100 years ago, except for horrific damage &#8230;caused by Novelty.   </p>
<p>I must respectfully decline any novelty.</p>
<p>However I do applaud you for however reluctantly shouldering whatever burdens Sir you seem to be bringing yourself around to doing&#8230;Bravo.   If only we had a few more like you our troubles would pass sooner and with less damage. </p>
<p>Bravo, I mean this sincerely.    Good luck in your endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garr</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/02/24/making-impossible-thoughts-possible/#comment-11099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=1633#comment-11099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Synagogue&quot; won&#039;t work as an anti-Jewish substitute for &quot;Cathedral&quot;, Mr. Blood.  &quot;Synagogues&quot;, i.e. shuls, are independent organizations run by their members, who hire their own rabbis and establish their own protocols and programs of study.  &quot;Cathedral&quot; more appropriately suggests a vast social architecture.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Synagogue&#8221; won&#8217;t work as an anti-Jewish substitute for &#8220;Cathedral&#8221;, Mr. Blood.  &#8220;Synagogues&#8221;, i.e. shuls, are independent organizations run by their members, who hire their own rabbis and establish their own protocols and programs of study.  &#8220;Cathedral&#8221; more appropriately suggests a vast social architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Blood</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/02/24/making-impossible-thoughts-possible/#comment-11081</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Blood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 17:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=1633#comment-11081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re right.  So often we look for the Silver Bullet idea that will irresistibly bring down The Synagogue this week.  Yet, the Soviet Union slowly but surely lost credibility over time.  By its end, no one believed any of it. 

We need to be ready with something when the time comes.  The time is not of our choosing--events will dictate it.  On one hand, we slowly but steadily chip away at the credibility of The Synagogue, and on the other hand prepare for the restoration.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right.  So often we look for the Silver Bullet idea that will irresistibly bring down The Synagogue this week.  Yet, the Soviet Union slowly but surely lost credibility over time.  By its end, no one believed any of it. </p>
<p>We need to be ready with something when the time comes.  The time is not of our choosing&#8211;events will dictate it.  On one hand, we slowly but steadily chip away at the credibility of The Synagogue, and on the other hand prepare for the restoration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
