Neoreaction is a Jewish Conspiracy to Thwart the Incipient National Socialist Revolution
Written by Mark Yuray Posted in Uncategorized
…is exactly the sort of nonsense to which I will be now establishing a well-rounded rebuttal.
Are you a conservative or rightist of some kind? Have you heard about neoreaction? Have you heard good things about it? Have you heard bad things? Have you heard that neoreaction is just a bunch of Silicon Valley nerds with obscene power fantasies? Have you heard neoreaction is really just bunch of wimpy Yankees theorizing from an Ivory Tower (skyscraper?) in New York City? Have you heard neoreaction is just a poorly articulated justification for racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and bigotry? Have you heard neoreaction is just a lazy, long-winded excuse not to engage in right-wing political activism? Have you heard, perhaps, that neoreaction is nothing more than another Jewish conspiracy to subvert the interests of white European Westerners and everything they know, love and stand for?
What you have heard, my friend, may not be entirely accurate. There has been ample, pained, and published work trying to answer the question “what is neoreaction?,” and the answer seems elusive yet. It is, however, less difficult to enumerate a list of things neoreaction is not. For example, neoreaction is not a motor vehicle. Neoreaction is not a form of government. Neoreaction is not libertarianism. Neoreaction is not [just] monarchism. Neoreaction is not a website. Neoreaction is not a Jewish conspiracy. Neoreaction is, for that matter, not a conspiracy of Silicon Valley nerds, highfalutin’ Yankees, pompous urbanites, incorrigible bigots or lazy conservatives. It is true that some Silicon Valley nerds, highfalutin’ Yankees, pompous urbanites, incorrigible bigots, and lazy conservatives all find a home in neoreaction — as do some Jews. Yet no single group dominates the neoreactionary bubble of thought, so much so that neoreactionaries delineate three separate zones of neoreactionary thought and affiliation, termed the Trichotomy of theonomy, ethnonationalism and techno-commercialism. In other words: faith, blood, and property. God, family, and guns. Everybody’s got a favorite, but nobody maintains less than all three.
Neoreaction was more-or-less founded by the prolific writer and programmer Mencius Moldbug sometime around 2007. This basic point seems to be agreed-upon by nearly everyone. Moldbug could easily qualify as a Jew (a half-Jew), a Silicon Valley nerd, and a pompous urbanite. Moldbug may have been the catalyst for this new intellectual phenomenon, yet before, during and after Moldbug’s de facto hiatus in 2013, neoreaction has flowered into far more than him alone. Dozens of neoreactionary articles are written every day. Neoreactionaries are meeting offline. Neoreactionaries are forming occult networks. If you don’t see neoreaction doing anything, that’s just because you haven’t looked — or, because neoreaction doesn’t want you to see what it’s doing. Moldbug hasn’t been scheming for years behind-the-scenes, directing neoreaction from a synagogue. He’s been busy with far less sinister things. So who exactly has been steering the NRx-Mobile, hidden behind tinted windows?
1. Neoreaction is demographically less Jewish than a Hamas birthday party.
How could anyone imagine that a group adopting a mascot as supremely non-kosher as a crab was Judaic in any shape or form?
Shellfish: not kosher.
There are three Jews who are or have been involved in neoreaction. Two are half-Jewish. The third is quarter-Jewish. This makes them gentile enough to be Nazi field marshals. The three are the aforementioned Mr. Moldbug, Mr. Boetel from Radish Magazine, and the Anti-Democracy Activist. Mr. Moldbug is not religious, and hasn’t contributed a word to neoreaction since 2013. Mr. Boetel posts sporadically (the last time was in November), and makes a blogging out of masterfully mocking and deconstructing liberal-progressive narratives on history and current affairs. The Anti-Democracy Activist is a convert to Catholicism. Instead of the flag of Israel, he flies the flag of Rhodesia. If this here is a sinister Jewish conspiracy, it strikes me as a rather lackluster one. My Jew-dar just isn’t detecting anything. In any case, I must recommend reading all three men. And so what about the rest of the neoreactionaries?
The columnists for this very neoreactionary website include one Minnesotan Catholic, one Catholic Slav, a grizzly American Southerner and three Anglo-Saxon gentiles. Zero Jews. Guest writers have included Russians, Scandinavians, and more Anglo-Saxons of various kinds. No Jews to my knowledge. The aggregator for neoreaction, Reaction Times, is curated by a reactionary Protestant from Canada. Listed in the aggregator are 30+ sites maintained by gentiles of European descent, and three maintained by the aforementioned souls of the most tangential Jewish background. Aside from Mr. Moldbug, the most influential neoreactionaries are largely English, American and otherwise natively Anglophone. Russians, Slovenians, and Bulgarians make a mark too. Ditto American Southerners. The latest newcomers have been Croatian and Turkish. Hangers-on from Spain, Brazil, Scotland, the rest of the Anglosphere, South Africa, the Netherlands, Ireland, India, Panama, Scandinavia and elsewhere round out the neoreactionary sphere. I am still not aware of any neoreactionaries from Israel, nor any with surnames suffixed with ‘-berg,’ ‘-stein,’ or ‘-witz.’ Indeed, yours truly receives more traffic from Taiwan, Romania, and the United Arab Emirates than from Israel. Judaeoreaction? Why not Sinoreaction or Islamoreaction?
Current and active neoreactionaries are overwhelmingly European gentiles. The largest currents seem to be Anglo-Saxon, Roman Catholic, American Orthodox and Slavic. The most grossly over-represented ethnic group among neoreactionaries is not Jews, but South Slavs. The most cursory demographic investigation will reveal not just that neoreactionaries are not Jews, but that neoreactionaries aren’t necessarily Silicon Valley nerds, highfalutin’ Yankees, pompous urbanites, incorrigible bigots or lazy conservatives either. Some married with kids and others unattached students. Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, neo-pagan and atheist. Former libertarians, former progressives, former Tea Partiers, former paleoconservatives, former fascists, former apoliticals, and former Marxists. Born and raised everywhere from Alaska to Australia. I think we even have a woman or two. The diversity of neoreaction, in fact, highlights precisely how non-Jewish it is. Jews, far from running the show the way they do for neoconservatives, communists, or progressives (but I repeat myself), are conspicuously missing. If neoreaction is a Jewish conspiracy, it is the first one without any Jews.
2. Moldbug alone is not the sole arbiter of neoreactionary thought.
Mr. Enoch from The Right Stuff objects to Moldbug’s dismissal of white nationalism and psychologist Kevin Macdonald’s theory of innate Jewish behavior. Many neoreactionaries find Moldbug’s original position lacking, myself included. Many more accept Macdonald’s theory. Many are explicit ethnonationalists. Is Moldbug’s Jewish ancestry preventing him from reaching some unsavory conclusions? Perhaps, perhaps not. It doesn’t matter. Moldbug is not the sole arbiter of neoreactionary thought. His long deconstruction of the progressive worldview was an indisputable godsend to us Children of Modernity. His neocameralism — disputable. His poetry… eh. Key tenets of neoreaction, including the Trichotomy and the concept of Gnon, were not brainchildren of Moldbug’s. Neoreaction tangles with Evolian metaphysics, the tripartite caste society, entryism, geopolitics, holiness spirals, practical reaction, Western religion, “gene-culture co-evolution” and more, cheerfully and without Moldbug. Disagreements with Moldbug do not entail disagreements with neoreaction as a whole. Neoreaction is more than just Moldbug — which is why it’s called neoreaction and not Moldbuggianism.
Moldbug’s focus on Puritan/Protestant leftism to the exclusion of negative Jewish influence on Western civilization rightly irks some. Let it be repeated and emphasized that both Moldbug and neoreaction at large focus not on Puritanism, Protestantism or Christianity per se as the sicknesses of civilization, but rather the steady process of leftist degradation that used them as a vector over the centuries. No, Puritans wouldn’t approve of Iggy Azalea. This does not invalidate neoreactionary theories about leftism, holiness spirals, and Puritanism. It seems that now a more rightly neoreactionary position would be that both Jews and Puritans share significant blame for the decline of the West. An autopsy for Western civilization might read: “Immune system critically weakened by virulent holiness spiral and concomitant leftism. Fatal stroke from foreign pathogen.” There are surely many other groups and individuals who helped cause this untimely death in some way or another, but these two religious minorities seem to be the primary culprits.
Is Macdonald’s theory of Jewish behavior correct? If not, it wouldn’t be for lack of evidence. I don’t find the theory shocking, strange or unique at all. Macdonald does a thorough job of documenting what a hostile minority looks like. Regular minorities turn into hostile minorities after majorities try to forcibly convert, enslave, eradicate or otherwise injure them. Alternately, regular majorities turn into hostile majorities after minorities try to scam, deceive, impose on, thieve from or otherwise injure them. Minorities become hostile to survive. Majorities would argue that the minorities deserved it, being the dirty parasites and predators that they are. The minorities view the majorities the same way. Who “started it” is always impossible to figure out, and instead of turning to endlessly complicated conspiracy theories, it is much easier just to remember a simple heuristic: diversity plus proximity equals conflict.
3. Neoreaction answers the Jewish Question, once and for all.
Neoreaction, contrary to vitriolic accusations leveled against it, has not stayed suspiciously silent on the Jewish Question. Nick B. Steves wrote a three-part series on the issue. He concluded:
The Jews qua Jews are so uniquely destabilizing that no Jew could ever be trusted with any amount of power. They should be banned from our organization (presuming we had one) and probably forcibly relocated to a homeland of their own.
Do you smell latkes? I don’t. Jim has done a lot of his own commentary on Jews and cultural Marxism, Jews and anti-Semitism, Jews and Puritans, and Jewish misbehavior. Nick Land has staked his position. 28Sherman displayed a keen awareness of all things Jewish and political just yesterday. Neoreactionaries, steeped as they are in politically incorrect, anti-Semitic, old history books, are far more than acquainted with questions of Jews and Judaism. The perceived silence of neoreactionaries on this topic is not borne of conspiracy or cowardice, but conclusion.
The most perfunctory appraisal of the situation reveals that the Jews were and are a religiously and genetically distinct minority among Christian Europeans. Diversity plus proximity equals conflict. Each and every nefarious action attributed to Jews throughout history in the West can be traced to the ubiquitous and ever-present hostility that exists between different ethno-religious groups (or thedes or phyles). This hostility is a law of the Universe, a dictate of Gnon’s. Evil Jewish Bolshevism, depraved Jewish pornography, destructive Jewish capitalism, chauvinistic Jewish Zionism — all can be easily and sensibly interpreted as various manifestations of natural conflict between hostile groups i.e. Jews and Christian Europeans, Jews and Muslims, etc. There is little reason to zero in on the Jews and obsess about them as uniquely heinous among all the world’s peoples. The only thing unique about them is their continued survival despite the scale and length of their run-ins with foreign gentile civilizations, but this differentiates them by degree, not type — Jews are not at all the only hostile minority on the planet, and not at all the only one that’s survived to 2015. Various expressions of anti-Semitism throughout history, such as the Holocaust or the Russian pogroms, can also be sensibly interpreted using this paradigm of ethnic conflict. The manifestations of ethnic conflict may be complex, but the underlying causes are always the same: diversity and proximity. It is not difficult to figure out and most neoreactionaries have done so, and thus shut up about it.
Law of Gnon: This is what the out-group looks like to the in-group. Always.
The answer to the Jewish question, as Mr. Steves concluded, is quite simple: segregation and separation. This solution is not unique to the Jews, but is the standard tried-and-true, traditional method of solving the problem of the violence at the nexus of diversity and proximity. Note that unlike progressives, neoreactionaries do not believe one can abolish the laws of nature and turn diversity into a strength, least of all using the State. Diversity engenders animosity and eventually violence, and is thus a weakness. The only solution to diversity is unity. Separate and segregate. This axiom is true when considering Jews and Europeans, and it is true when considering any other two distinct groups.
This is how liberals see conservatives. Law of Gnon strikes again. Always.
-
Satisfied with the question of the Jews, neoreactionaries notice that the rot in Western civilization frequently attributed solely to the Jews had in fact existed long before subversive Jews did (see: Jim). Neoreactionaries notice that there exists an entire science of civilization with its own laws and principles. They notice that the architecture of contemporary civilization is slowly disintegrating. They notice saboteurs and invaders. Ahead they notice a barren grave with their names on it, and they notice grotesque monstrosities rising from Hades and beckoning to them with meticulously tailored malformed claws: “Check your privilege.” Neoreactionaries notice all this and judge it terribly unworthy. It is just a matter of opinion whether the next step is letting the edifice of civilization collapse, building a new civilization in the ruins, or attempting to stay the badly quivering columns.
Or maybe what’s needed is Zombie Hitler and another round with those damn shadowy Hebrews. But if so, close your Internet browser — you won’t find them here in neoreaction.
I commented on this question recently in an Alternative Right site, so I reproduce the combined two comments here:
Fascists are progressive socialists, and thus they eventually ruin the economy, if given power and it lasts long enough. But anyway, some of you are fascists, and even more are anti-Jewish. The latter seems to be a sort of fashion among some. I have said elsewhere that anti-Jewishness is counterproductive, and there is a better way. I explain more why it is so. First, you are a little bit right, there are some top liberal elite members, Jews, Europeans and others, which are at least partly motivated by hatred against you. Billionaire George Soros is one such person, although what he does and facilitates is mainly motivated by his power interests, not hatred. His actions are, unfortunately, logical considering his power interests from a liberal point of view. But in general upper class elites who are motivated by hatred are a small minority, and those who have hatred motives have mostly more important and compelling other motives to their actions and policies. Most of you, if not all, are from lower and middle classes. People from lower and middle class feel on average more negative feelings than upper class people. Upper class people, being at the top and in good situation overall, are on average more satisfied with their situation, status, wealth, belongings, work, social relations etc., more satisfied with their life in general, so they feel on average less negative feelings. You are mostly motivated by legitimate reactions to real grievances. Because of grievances you have negative feelings. Some of you might also at the same time ventilate here negative feelings that are generated by reasons that are not especially related to liberals; normal stresses at work, dissatisfaction about your present life situation, problems in marital or other social relations, frustrations spawned by accumulations of little everyday setbacks, etc. Some of you may have psychological propensity to feel relatively much negative feelings, and well, this site is a good place to discharge them, and so it might attract such people. Together this means that you feel a lot of negative or negatively related feelings; anger, grudges, dissatisfaction, envy, jealousy, contempt, guilt, regret, remorse, fear, schadenfreude, outrage, embarrassment, shame, distrust, frustration, depression, apathy, etc. This kind of psychological world seems to you natural, so you project it on others (projection is one of the psychological defenses). Others must be same kind of people, you think. If somebody does something bad to you and your people unjustly, without legitimate reasons and out of proportion, your natural reaction is to think that he hates you and he is an evil person. If there are many of them, they are in various ways organized, and they claim through communications channels, which they dominate and mostly prevent others from using, that they want good to everyone, they represent all that is good in society, that we are heading for a great future, and you see that it is not so and that they have in general snaffled all power to themselves, you naturally try to find their secret evil motives, clandestine wicked plans and malignant relations. Many middle managers, who do the dirty work of the liberal system, like media personnel, sensitivity trainers and liberal activist politicians, may in fact hate you. They have conformed to the requirements of the system and learned to discharge their negative feelings on you (formed a habit about it), and see you hence as threatening opponents / enemies, who must be constantly extinguished. They are on average true believers in liberalism. However, top elites, who rule liberal society have mostly different psychology and views.
High status liberals have on average less emotional attachment to principles, systems and ideologies, whatever gives them high status is likely to be OK (not true believers). When e.g. abundant moralizing and preaching is hoisted upon normal people about the nefarious nature of nazism and communism, among themselves top liberals see them as just legimate, but failed systems, normal options for the elites, which they could still choose, if they wanted to. If they would choose them, they would manipulate people’s minds to be propitious and accepting towards them, like has happened with liberalism. High status liberals have inflated sense of self, they become in several ways more narcissistic as their status rise. They feel more positive feelings, and have more positive self-esteem. They are more over-confident and too optimistic. They are more likely to break rules, and take liberties and privileges to themselves. They are more likely to cheat on exams and tests, and steal from common cash. They are more likely to escape from the scene of accident, which they caused. They are more careless, and more likely to cause accidents. They are more indifferent to the negative consequences they cause to others. They feel less empathy. They see people in more dehumanizing ways, as numbers, impersonal massess, resources/human resources, etc. They feel entitled to special treatment and things. They are less likely to feel negative or related feelings like jealousy, schadenfreude, envy, bitterness, grudges, etc. (this reduces their narcissism to some extent, i.e. high status both increases and decreases narcissism, but increases it more). They have less need to heal negative feelings and low self-esteem with e.g. schadenfreude. When they compare themselves socially to someone who is at the same class, but has a little bit higher status, they are less likely to feel negative feelings, such as envy, bitterness, grudges, diffidence etc., and more likely to feel positive feelings, such that they can e.g. use the higher status person as a positive role model (thus they are more likely to imitate and conform unthinkingly to the prevailing norms and requirements of the top elites). Etc.
High status liberals are not likely to feel guilt, regret or shame when they do something; when high status liberals cause negative consequences to their reference group, e.g. Whites or Finns, but not to themselves, they are likely to feel this as genuine self-sacrifice and altruism, sacrifice for a higher cause and principles. Symbolic sacrifice which feels to them as genuine self-sacrifice. They often feel benefactors of whole mankind or some such lofty sounding entity. Whatever they do, they want a positive emotional spin to it, and almost always get it from others due to their power. They live inside a liberal echo-chamber, a liberal bubble. No matter how irrational or illogical their thoughts and actions are, they always get their social confirmation from their subjects. At the same time they profit from the deterioration of the system and country, which cause problems to Whites. E.g. high status leftists get more leftist voters and bureaucratic customers from immigrants. High status rightist owners get more cheap labor and more customers to their businessess, e.g. malls and department stores, from immigrants. In practice the leftist and rightist motives are overlaping. These profits and advantages are huge and concrete in their lives everyday and every moment, and the suffering of their people is distant, vague and muffled. They are not in contact with the lives of ordinary people, and they could as well live in a different planet. Also the requirements of the system as a whole seen from the liberal point of view is massive in their mind. They feel responsible for the functioning of the system. What little they are aware of the resistance and discontent among the people, they minimize its importance, and say to themselves and among themselves that people doesnt know how the system functions and what it demands. People have contradicting demands which cannot be reconciled, they e.g. demand cheap food and resist cheap labor immigration, which could produce cheap food. Top elites have the superior view over the system and understand its demands and functions, so they have to resolve the peoples contradiction for them with decisive action. The system cannot wait, it has to be steered to the right directions every moment. And if people complain about immigration while they are munching the immigrant produced cheap food, then they must be manipulated in every way to be reconciled to the system’s immigration with all kinds of lies, coercions, incentives, distortions etc. of the media; education; mixed housing and schooling; authority exhortations and examples; the bought and paid Ngos; politically distorted books; etc. Top elites dont sully their hands in this dirty work, it is left to the bought middle managers of the system. It doesnt matter to high status liberals that immigrants have lower productivity, lower IQ, less money and wealth, higher criminality, more welfare dependency, more religious radicalism, more social and job dysfunction, that immigrants lower all kinds of standards, etc. High status liberals get e.g. more mall customers even from welfare dependent drug addict immigrants, and thus more profits, thus higher status, more capacity to insulate themselves from the negative consequences of their own policies, and more capacity to seal themselves off into the liberal information bubble.
Notice also that high status liberals cheat, steal, avoid responsibility, do callous things etc. to some extent for different reasons than low status people, who also do those more than the average people. Low status people do those things more to enable them to reduce negative feelings and to lift self-esteem, to right “injustice”, because of thrill seeking, to gain more status and wealth, for which there is a high need, etc. High status liberals do those things more because of over-confidence, feeling of entitlement, arrogance, high self-concept, because of “rules dont apply to me, I make and decide my own rules”, because of blurring of the boundaries in the mind between what is mine and what is yours, etc. Top liberals are generally superficial, ignorant and simple minded people. They know how to lead, understand the functions of the system and know the special knowledge connected to their jobs, but other than that they have only superficial wide ranging information about things. They are not intellectuals. They can small talk about almost anything, but not think about them deeply and thoroughly. They have handful of thick social relations and lots of wide ranging thin and superficial social relations, but which are nonetheless obliging to liberal cooperation. They are busy people, who live mostly in the requirements of the moment, and make almost always quick intuitive, not deeply thought, decisions. They are good at multitasking, understanding and doing many things at the same time. When they think together about big plans for the world, it simplistically naturally feels to them that the whole world should be under liberal rule, under their rule. Minor detail of this plan is that it is easier to the liberal system’s information processing, bureaucratic procedures, conflict management, political management, creation of borderless world without barriers, etc. if all the people of the world would be totally mixed to undifferentiated “gray race”. Because of this the top elites feel they make the humanity a favor when they reconcile the ethnic contradictions so that people are maximally suitable and pliable human resources to the single global system. People may resist, but again the top elites think they know better because of their superior view of the system, so they feel entitled to continue the race-mixing manipulation of the people of the world “for their true interests, for their own good”.
I know by way of practical knowledge what and how the top liberal elites think. Do you understand now that there are no evil conspiracies, lead by shifty, hand rubbing and sniggering cabal of hook nosed Jews, whose only burning motive is to destroy the White race? Anti-Jewish sentiments are counterproductive, because it traps you to emotional reactionary prison of your own making. You react to the latest outrage of the liberal Jews, and waste your time trying to find out what kind of relations Jews have with one another. Instead you should learn how the system functions, so you can analyze, understand and influence it, and thus gain real power.
So you want power. To enable that you need to understand what it is not, and then what it is. Anti-Jewish writers seem to think that if they reveal long lists of who have thick or thin relations to whom, and who have given monetary support to whom, power is revealed. This they seem to do almost exclusively to liberal Jews, not to liberal Whites and other ethnicities. They never seem to analyze the functions of those relations or people (singly or collectively) in the context of the liberal system, thus they have no way of knowing their real meaning and importance. For example If somebody lists all my thick and thin relations (The former are more important in strong and concentrated relations of group formation and function, the latter are more numerous, loose and extensive, and thus generally more important in generating diffuse and wide societal power. These can mutually strenghten each other.) I may look on paper to be a really powerful man. But if somebody analyzes me and my relations, and compares these to other relations networks in liberal society, it is found out that my power is middle of the road -ordinary power and influence. Big deal is made out of that e.g. Jewish capitalist billionaires fund leftist groups, political parties and organizations. This is a normal procedure in liberal power. All billionaires and multimillionaires buy, fund, direct the illusory opposition, like almost all the other significant collective groups too. International bankers have controlled almost all leftists and other supposed oppositions in USA at least from the beginning of the 20th century onwards. So what is power then? Power is among other things care of the elderly, health care system, large pension funds, social security bureaucracy, motor production, food production, oil trade, arms trade, illegal drug trade, political parties / systems, political economy, stock exchange, education, etc. Power is functions of society, and those who control and direct the functions of society, rule society. Because you dont control and direct almost any functions in society collectively, you dont have almost any power. You can talk here until the end of time, but it doesnt in itself increase your power much. E.g. leftists are heavily involved in care of the elderly, health care, social security bureaucracy, education, trade unions, etc., and thus they have vast power in society. Bankers are involved in important ways in almost all the significant functions of society, so they have huge power. Food production is collectively a large business, so those who direct that has a great power. Etc. You may say, “Care of the elderly? Rollators racing slowly through corridors. That is so very boring. I dont want to know about it.” Well, you have wrong way of seeing it. If you see it as a system, which has functions, it can be as interesting as any system, e.g. illegal drug trade. If you are not interested in systems and functions, in modern society it means you are not interested in power and somebody else will then decide among other things immigration policy for you. Your mind plays you out of the power game. While you may talk here about fantasy empires, a Finnish leftist politician Anna Kontula said in his latest blog post that she has read various reasearch about the costs of Finnish of public sector and other public sectors in Europe, she compared and analyzed them, and not surprisingly, concluded that Finnish public sector is efficient and cheap compared to others. This is in many ways politically motivated conclusion, but she has significant power in Finland, and her blog posts immediately tell why. She has understanding of the liberal system’s functions and their developments in different times and places. Other leftist politicians and other leftist influentials talk like that to their public and among themselves in Finland. To those who have power in Finland, open immigration was just an issue of declaration that it will start. Their say so was enough, no public debates, no democratic voting, no care for the consequences, no asking the peoples input, etc. It was just a continuation and an arm of their expansionary power politics, a natural consequence of it. Elderly care -power, bankers power, food production -power and other such powers opened our (and your) borders.
So what should you do, how do you get started? What is the most important thing in getting power? The universal “language” of the liberal system is economics. Everything in the system is assessed, understood, analyzed and directed with economics. You should not reduce everything to economics, but you must understand it. If you are average productive person, your net value to the system is a couple of millions during lifetime; crime and crime prevention costs and benefits are calculated financially; what research is done is decided by money flows; new frontiers to food production in developing countries are incentiviced, analyzed and directed by low costs of production and transport, and profits expected from the growing world population; etc. You must understand such functions as comparative advantage, opportunity cost, production possibility frontier, gains from specialization, asymmetric information problem (e.g. ‘lemons’ in used car sales), principal agent problem, price elasticity or inelasticity, marginal utility, indifference curves, the degree of substitutability, etc. You must understand the psychological corrections to homo economicus model from behavioral economics. Microeconomics is the most important economics field, and in a way it contains other economic fields. Concretely I recommend e.g (filter any and all liberal biases away from these in your mind): Michael Parkin, Microeconomics; Paul R. Krugman and Maurice Obstfeld, International Economics, Theory and Policy; and David R. Just, Introduction to Behavioral Economics. To widen your understanding to different forms of power, developments of power, the possibility horizons of power, the capillary spreading of power from the elites to the minds, bodies and tasks of people, etc., I recommend Michel Foucault’s or related power analyses; Abnormal; Security, Territory and Population; The Birth of Biopolitics; Discipline and Punish; Psychiatric Power; The Birth of the Clinic; Power/Knowledge; Power; History of Madness; Society Must Be Defended; The Foucault Effect; etc. And Pierre Bourdieu’s State Nobility; Homo Academicus; The Field of Cultural Production; Language and Symbolic Power; The Social Structures of the Economy; etc. This is a good start. The following is your starting point, which you should escape:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2014/08/12/study-you-have-near-zero-impact-on-u-s-policy/
Please read Scruton, Valkea.
”Oikophobia”, coined by the British philosopher Roger Scruton, is here used as a non-clinical description of an ‘anti-culture’ prevalent among Western artists and intellectuals. It is a combination of:
”oikos” – from the Greek meaning a “house,” “family,” “people,” or “nation”
– Encyclopaedia Britannica
and
”-phobia” – extreme or irrational fear or dislike of a specified thing or group
-Webster’s Dictionary
An extreme and immoderate aversion to the sacred and the thwarting of the connection of the sacred to the culture of the West appears to be the underlying motif of oikophobia; and not the substitution of Judeo-Christianity by another coherent system of belief. The paradox of the oikophobe seems to be that any opposition directed at the theological and cultural tradition of the West is to be encouraged even if it is “significantly more parochial, exclusivist, patriarchal, and ethnocentric”. (Mark Dooley, Roger Scruton: Philosopher on Dover Beach (Continuum 2009), p. 78.)
The term also occasionally appears in psychology with the more literal sense of a fear of home.
Scruton defines it as “the repudiation of inheritance and home,” and refers to it as “a stage through which the adolescent mind normally passes.” Roger Scruton, ”A Political Philosophy”, p. 24.
WAIT WAIT. I didn’t conclude that. I said it was one possible conclusion. One that I still do not draw!! Tho’ I do appreciate all the cred I get in the Hardcore Antisemite circles for it.
Overall, however, I do agree with the tenor of Mark’s piece: Neoreaction is not a Jewish conspiracy. More important, neoreaction is a conspiracy to prevent just such a conspiracy, as it is focused principally on designing institutions that resist leftward drift. As I said over at Enoch’s TRS piece: Conquest’s Second Law doesn’t go far enough. Not only do institutions not formally right wing eventually become left wing, but EVEN institutions that are formally right wing eventually do so too (GOP, NRO, TAC, Focus on the Family, Rooshv Forum, etc.). So the question of how to build an left-resistant institution is a hard problem.
The question of building a left-resistant institution is an impossible problem. Institutions are always subject to men, and therefore always subject to leftward drift. It needs to be recognized that the Aristotelian project of replacing Good Man theory of government with Good Law theory has failed. Institutions and Laws are merely a disguise for a human ruler. We’re back to the problem of Ch. 7 of Plato’s Republic: how do we ensure that a Good Man rules?
Institutions are subject, inherently, to drift over time. Indeed, they are ultimately subject to human foibles, contingent upon time and space. If they were just as likely to drift rightward as leftward over time, we wouldn’t be asking the question. But they are overwhelmingly drifting leftward over these past 4-500 years or so. That seems highly unusual. Why is there such a strong bias against the status quo? And why is it so overwhelmingly in one direction?
I would argue that it’s unidirectional only from a flawed point of view. Rather than right-left, the paradigm is the Ground of Being versus the Periphery of Being (see Richard Weaver). When you understand reality as a point in the center of a field and deviation as a movement away from the center toward the fringe, then all movement can be unidirectional (fringeward) while simultaneously being random.
Given that this is an ontological movement rather than a literal physical movement, of course, the metaphor only extends so far, but movement from the fringe to the core should be as rare as rain flowing uphill, hence why Christian thought typically requires divine intervention for such a move.
replace the word “center” with core or ground. I don’t intend to give credence to the fallacy of centrism as truth between two “extremes”.
Why is there such a strong bias against the status quo? And why is it so overwhelmingly in one direction?
It’s the Second Law of Thermodynamics, but for societies. Leftism is entropy.
True. Left=entropy. And yet for most of (recognizably) human history, human civilizations drifted toward order—in Gordian’s terminology, the spiritual ground of being. Then all the sudden, all nations almost at once started drifting away. And the right, i.e., order, i.e., ground of being, only manages to win at minor skirmishes once every couple generations or so. It’s a puzzle I think. If it is an epicycle, then it is a very, very long one that is hard to observe, and hard to find any known natural forces behind.
Actually, I deeply disagree. Mot of human history is defined by the movement away from order towards disorder. The Hebrew scriptures center around the flight from the covenant, and classical Greco-Roman mythic history focuses on the decline through successive “metal” ages from Gold to the current Iron. Roman “Gold Age” literature focuses on the Caesars as “restorers” of Rome, which necessitates a view of the world in decline for centuries, and Silver Age literature is explicitly declinist.
The only time the “Right” has ever won has been either mythological (Romulus, Theseus, Moses), upon the back of a Great Man (Alexander, Caesar, Napoleon, all of whom are debatable, but that’s another argument) or in the wake of utter destruction of the previous order (the Carolingian Empire, the Russian Empire as successors to Rome, West and East). None of those situations have applied to the last 500 years except Napoleon, and that one is sketchy, since we could make arguments that he perpetuated the decline of France rather than arrested it.
The ‘left’ specification is a chimera. If these people actually specified a reasonable definition they would find their own beliefs refuted.
Worse, but with much more potential is ‘order’.
I’m Jewish. Orthodox. AND female. Do I win the Unicorn of the Day Award?
Anyway – I think you summed it up quite nicely here. I think the more simple-minded folks who seek easy explanations are the first to blame all of their problems on “The JOOOOOOZ” whereas the more intelligent can see that the issue is much more complex. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that different groups have different and often competing interests. I don’t think it’s necessarily a genius idea to constantly be blaming, scapegoating and in effect, alienating a very high-IQ high-achieving group of people as if they are the ONLY party responsible for the decay of the West etc. It’s also missing the point that many of us have been negatively affected just as much by the inhospitable Multicultural, anti-traditional climate that is America 2015. We’re all adults here and we can handle criticism (well, I can). This is why I like neoreaction.
Another piece of information that may be helpful – there is a very very large group of people in Israel and many Orthodox Jews who would likely agree with pretty much everything you say on this blog. Many of them are Anti-Democratic, pro-Monarchist, anti-Multicultural (they want to kick all the Arabs out of Israel), and deeply Reactionary. The people over at Amerika.org are maybe (overly) philo-Semitic but they have a good grip on the importance of working with and learning from like-minded people, etc. Maybe instead of blaming Jews for all of their problems they seek to emulate them? Ya’ll probably have more in common than one would imagine. I even see White Nationalists trying to do this. Might be something to keep in mind.
http://www.amerika.org/politics/israel-leads-the-way-to-revival-of-nationalism/
White Nationalists want to emulate Jewish tribalism:
http://www.radixjournal.com/journal/2015/2/2/emulating-the-tribe
More info on Israeli Nationalist / Monarchist political parties:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kach_and_Kahane_Chai
MS/Mrs Katz,
I’m not actually racist or Anti-Semitic, nor Liberal or Leftist.
However,
You’re holding the Bag. Again. And it’s a very big, nasty bag. There’s about $900 Trillion in IOU’s in there [actual debt + derivatives] and your demographic is very heavily over-staffing the lunatics that ran up the bills. That’s your problem.
If things were rosy no one would care.
It isn’t fair or just but it is human and predictable.
I don’t think any out-group anywhere should be given the levers of power over an ethnically different group, not unless they’re one bad ass conquering army [and you’re not]. The current situation would be as if 1935 Russia suddenly became all armed and independent minded – that’s the US now.
So…good luck. I don’t mean you ill, but I’m one man. This current situation will not endure.
VVXC.
What you’re describing here is simply a problem of economically dominant minorities, anywhere in the world. Amy “Tiger Mom” Chua nailed it in “World on Fire” – an NRx-friendly and in-depth review of that book can be found here. The pattern seems to repeat everywhere, with different players:
http://www.neoeugenics.net/wof.htm
When a society goes sideways, minorities who have enjoyed disproportionate success are very obvious targets. I’ll grant you that making yourself a much more obvious target by over-staffing the organs used to censor the majority does make things worse. I would hope that armed and independent-minded Americans will take all help from anywhere, and let the dust settle afterward. But I do not know.
Meanwhile, the reality is that there are very large splits brewing within the Jewish community. This is especially notable in Israel, where a Jewish Left also controls many of the same levers it does here – and is every bit as hostile to its host society. I don’t know if those battles will finish before everyone is sucked into something wider, but NRx types would profit from careful looks at how the Orthodox groups are competing *within* Judaism, both in Israel and in America. My read is that unless the collapse really accelerates, the Orthodox are going to win decisively. Not only are they doing a good job maintaining cohesion in the face of a hostile culture, and using the secular Jews’ naturally-poor demography against them, they’re pulling that hostile culture toward a more observant pole.
Fethullah Gulen’s work in Turkey would be the other example I recommend, because it was a successful full-on fight against a hostile Deep State – which is to say, what America is formally becoming. Gulen used his own methods to lay that foundation, and his ability to successfully carry the fight into the mediasphere has no equal in Israel. Or much of anywhere else that I know. Subsequent hostility between Erdogan and the Gulenists adds another teaching element for NRx to consider carefully.
Any specific thing/book to read to follow the Gulen example?
Unless Unamused = Karl F. Boetel (a claim I’ve heard but not seen confirmed), you missed one: http://unamusementpark.com/2011/12/the-jewish-question/
I am an Israeli Jew who has been following NRx since 2013, and I find it a very interesting phenomenon with a correct way of getting at the truth. Those who wish to obsess over my people are of course welcome to do so if they so wish, it is quite amusing. The Jews have brought with them both problems and benefits to the Western world (and don’t forget that Ashkenazi Jews predate many other supposedly more authentic Europeans, such as the Slavs and Magyars). It is true that after the emancipation of the 19th century Jews became immensely successful, with many assimilating and pushing a Culture War through communism and progressivism at large. Progressive Jews still hold much power, especially in the USA.
Either way the thesis that it is best for every group and ethnicity to rule itself in amicable segregation is correct.
Good Article Mr. Yuray,
“Either way the thesis that it is best for every group and ethnicity to rule itself in amicable segregation is correct. ”
Yes. What the Hell were people thinking? Everywhere.
I find these responses to your article quite hilarious. Since I’ve publicly written NRX I’ve been tempted to include a little “takeaway” or “moral of the story” at the end of essays, because people often want to impose some categorization that makes thinking easier for them, but ignores the whole purpose of what was written. This may be one of those articles for you. But its a fascinating topic.
The only glue that seems to hold NRX together is anti-liberal mentality. Many of the sub-groups of NRX seem to be at odds on almost every point outside this, whether it involve transhumanists v. trad-cons or Jewish rightists v. White ethno-nationalists, etc, etc.
Most NatSocs are what I’d call “boutique fascists” or “boutique fringe.” They’re shopping from the same small suite of memes. Any NatSoc group that is “active” in any way is comparable to a UFO-spotting club or Steampunk meetup group. There is no reason to be offended or attracted to it because its a disconnected novelty. NS’ have adopted all this vintage regalia/symbology and ideology that has nothing to do with modern American/European life. Many prominent members are also involved in Civil War reinactments or creative anachronism, which reveals how they think. NRX is more interested in “the now,” the future, and there already seem to be far more people participating in NRX crimethink than any NatSoc community outside of Stormfront.
I think it was Nick Steves who pointed out in one of the podcasts that “conspiracy theories” are widely accepted when they’re presented in an academic context. Saying there is a “Jewish Conspiracy” in Hollywood and the Congress will get a good liberal banished, however writing up an 80-page research paper on the influence of the “Israel lobby” and “Jewish values in the media” will receive acclaim from everyone including the Jews. One of the most sited articles on Jewish control of Hollywood was written in the LA Times (by a Jew) and describes in celebratory detail how every major film/actor is controlled by Jews. If the same article had been written in a slightly skeptical or negative tone, it obviously never would have been published and would end up as just another Stormfront rant.
If anything, NatSocs are likely a liberal conspiracy to undermine the incipient NRX “revolution” by tainting it with an immobile ideology that is lashed down to all these negative stereotypes – mainly the Hollywood profile of the “evil” ignorant skinhead racist hick who want to holocaustsixtrillionjews. Really, these NatSocs need to read a bit of Heartiste’s writing on “signaling” but I doubt most of them care to, because it seems to be more of a fetish than a legitimate intellectual campaign.
Good points you made here. Worth writing more on this topic. People are really obsessed with Jews/Nazis. Its like the Ben and Jerry show for victimologists.
Thank you for your advice, IA, and good comment J Katz.
Why bureaucracies drift leftward? It is a large question, but some important aspects are concisely the following:
1) Bureaucracy must first survive and maintain its existence before it can produce its services. This has a tendency over time to shift the purpose of the institution more to serving itself and its needs, and to shift it more away from serving people and their interests.
2) Bureaucrat is a small part of bureaucracy even if he is a leader of the bureaucracy, let alone average bureaucrat. Collective needs of the bureaucracy weight heavily on the single bureaucrats. Thus the collective functions of the bureaucracy become more compelling reasons for actions than the will and politics of single bureaucrats, and starts to shift their minds to the systems requirements direction.
3) When bureaucrats increasingly lose religion and consequently the purpose in life, they can only think of expanding and increasing bureaucracy and gaining more power to it as worthwhile endeavours, whether it is good for the people or not.
4) Bureaucrats try to increase bureacratic ‘fat’ as much as possible to protect their jobs and monetary interests. The more there is excess bureaucracy, the more it has power to protect itself from reductions of bureacracy, and if bureaucracy is reduced, the outer layers of fat is reduced first, protecting the core parts of bureacracy. The bigger the bureacracy is, the more power and the bigger salaries the leaders have.
5) The larger and more complex the bureaucracy is, the easier it is to diffuse blame so widely and convolutedly that it becomes harmless. Bureaucracies have created whole useless departments just that they have a scapegoats in the case of mistakes. Blame avoidance is one of the most important motivations to bureaucrats. Bureacrat mostly cannot increase his salary or status by doing his job better, but he can lose his job or prevent his promotions easily by making mistakes.
6) The more bureacracy expands and colonizes every aspect of peoples lives, the more people lose their functions, abilities, will, initiative and purposes, thus more bureacracy increases problems in society, which bureaucracy interprets that still more bureacracy is needed. Negative spiral develops.
7) Bureaucracy creates an illusion of rational control and planning of everything. Rationality/scientific knowledge becomes = more bureaucracy, more bureaucratic manipulation in society.
8) In bureaucratic functions the only important things are standardized skills and knowledge of the people. In bureacracy information processing requires most of the work, so it tries to reduce its information processing load, thus it wants its customers to become as similar and standardized as possible. Management of society requires less bureaucratic conflict management, if people are homogenous massess. Etc. All the differentiating qualities of the people hence become increasingly problematic, onerous and “harmful” to the bureaucracy. Bureacracy which is in advanced cancerous state, starts to destroy or dilute to unimportance ethnicities, religions, cultures, sexes, societally meaningful individual differences, communities, etc. Bureacracies central function and purpose is to make as many as possible average, to recycle one or two tails of Gaussian distribution toward the “normal” middle.
9) The larger the corporations and municipal organizations become, the more they start to resemble state bureaucracies, and the more they find common causes and harmonies with the state bureacracy, thus exacerbating the bureaucratic problem.
10) The bigger the bureacracies become, and the more they collectively take care of everything in society and peoples lives, the more important bureacracies are compared to people. Bureaucracy becomes all important, and people become insignificant. People become human resources, mathematical units, bureaucratically assessed monetary values, zeroes and ones in computer data, etc., dehumanized particles. Bureaucracy gives everything to people, gives life to them, so it can take everything it wants away from people. When expanding bureaucracy e.g. needs more units to its functions and power needs, it can replace its own people with immigrants. It can manipulate native units psychologically to accept foreign units, and think of them as similar.
Etc.
How to oppose this is a larger question, which I leave to a later time.
Seems to me that you don’t really consider half-Jews “Jewish”. Boetel and Moldbug — who are, it must be noted, two of NRx’s very brightest minds — are “gentile enough to be Nazi field marshals”, and are of the “most tangential Jewish background”.
If this is the case, why worry about it at all? Given the Jewish rate of intermarriage, and the fact that it’s accelerating at a rapid clip, secular Jews will all but disappear from the USA and Europe within our lifetimes. Two or three generations, tops. After that, the only secular Jews will be in Israel. The Orthodox and Hasidic Jews are, obviously, a whole ‘nother kettle of fish — but far less influential and powerful.
@Joe/Et Al,
Here is what I believe: that we have a people problem, not a systems problem. We don’t need in America a systems change other than to restore Constitutional Government which presently doesn’t exist at the National Capitol.
That this is a problem of the People at the National Capitol, and not the Constitution. (A position that places me at odds with most of NRxn).
That these people are extremely malicious and harmful and must be removed from any ability to do further harm. Most of these people are of course White, European American.*
[*but they stay out of public view. A wise policy that some can seemingly never learn].
That this isn’t a racial issue and never has been, it’s really a problem coming from America’s own elites both morphing into monstrosities and losing all bounds as a result of throwing down their own God Jesus in the 1960s, after which they went instantly and irrevocably insane and so Evil. However this doesn’t break down by Race or Religion – it just appears to – and if it was a religious conflict it’s one within Protestantism, and that America’s true racial conflict is White vs White. (Jews aren’t being considered White in this Correct Analysis). As far as religion it’s a Protestant conflict, America is a very Protestant nation. [I am Catholic of sorts].
Therefore Names not Groups. “Names Not Groups” is the first words I wrote on the subject of What is to be Done. Names precludes Groups, it’s also a far more limited and sensible approach to our actual problem. It can be sold primarily on grounds of sensible and limited war, which makes a great deal of sense to actual warriors [I am one]. Pointless destruction is entertaining only to psychopaths in practice, although many in Neo-reaction think it would be fun to watch. It isn’t.
Names Not Groups. It’s a Winner.
However,
I am but one man living in the World of Men.
Our actual Problem is within ourselves, however like modern Crime the problem can and does appear to breakdown racially. Crime for instance doesn’t truly breakdown Racially but it certainly seems to, actual crime breaks down by Families that is to say it’s passed on generation by generation. That’s based on personal knowledge but it wouldn’t be negated by either any experienced Cop or research that approached the problem deeper than Skin.
The Actual present 2015 Jewish Problem is your ethnic group is overstaffing Evil’s ranks in the United States Great Predation – the Great Predation being the period of Governance and Elite Preying on the rest that we’re presently suffering through.
Your problem is you’re holding the Bag, for whilst we’re talking overall about a small number of people they have the media presence of the Kardashians and about as much public grace and common sense.
This is happening in context of both across the board societal decay and breakdowns but worst of all our actual true Debt situation is far worse than is widely known, it’s in the hundreds of Trillions, when the Derivatives Americans are in practice and now by Law [Dec 2014] obliged to make good it’s over $900 Trillion.
Since the majority of names known publicly and indeed no small amount of the actual power are Jewish names, my proposed approach of Names Not Groups will probably not hold back the coming Deluge.
To add to the complications the relentless Race Baiting of Whites in the last election had the unexpected effect of “Turning on the White Lights” that is sudden awakening at the end of 2012 of White Racial Consciousness. As it happens it’s not possible to shit stir every single minority and fissure line, behavior and freak show against the majority without the sleeping majority awakening.
So don’t feel as it it’s just your group, it’s suddenly all of you we’ve quite had enough of all your antics. That’s across the board, suddenly it becomes acceptable even cool to refer to your own group again.
What I intend to do Sir is be part of whatever Action Americans take to free ourselves of our actual problem of Predatory Elites. I suspect we’ll approach this as Americans and not Europeans or Asians – because we’re not. This would suggest that targeting and reprisals against known innocents or entire groups will not be policy, although it will probably happen. In practice the path to being American through Valor or other deeds of merit is usually open to all, I think we’ll generally adhere to this course.
I think a wise aim of any settlement on the question of our fantastic debt issues – fantastic because they’re deliberately scaled so as part of a scam – is a General Debt wipe-out or Debt Amnesty in exchange for Amnesty for all misdeeds and crimes, abuses of power.
I think that is a most sensible and least costly path exchange.
I think any group having an outsize influence on such matters might want to consider that exchange. I mean You.
It isn’t Fair perhaps, but it’s certainly better than the Defaults – which are already running.
I think unfortunately that disclaimers of great evils and mischief committed disproportionately by ones clear co-ethnics and academic and historical arguments not to be unique are only academically valid that is to say …I’m sorry but there are certain things you “own” and any intellectual appeal otherwise will be seen as more Talmudic Sophistry (it’s easily the most annoying variety) and It Will Not Work. It never has.
From all benevolence: The Defaults are running, and the Defaults have $691 Trillion in Derivatives Bomb and $200 Trillion of actual USG debt moving the General Reckoning for all of us, but for your group very acutely. These are civilization ending amounts of money. Never mind you.
The Defaults are running, I suggest people act to change their Fate. Be assured we are.
Be assured that We Are.
[By the Way my personal feelings are actually more towards benevolence, I have too many friends and have known too many good people to think you’re congenitally Evil. Your actual problem is misplaced loyalty towards your own bad elements (I understand this flaw sympathetically) and hence the source of recursive failings. My own personal feelings however mean…nothing. Nor do I let them affect my analysis. Only Cold People who act Coldly will win. ]
I think your post is a straight-up assessment. Nice to talk to people who think.
One quibble – and it rather rebounds against the optimism in your post. I understand the thinking behind your recommended trade. I’m just less sanguine about the feasibility, or the wisdom of an endgame that doesn’t really force the prime enemy to admit utter defeat. Enemies must be soundly defeated, or they do not change and everything recurs. To me, Gnon says you have to win above all, then deal with whatever hand you get after that. You can pick different paths to “We win” in the hope that they will improve long-term positioning, but you can’t remove the necessity.
I don’t like some implications of that. I’m pretty sure that Gnon doesn’t care.
The question with respect to Jews is whether the battles within Judaism will resolve into a useful outcome before wider currents create a wider conflict. I tend to think we don’t have enough clock left, but there’s a useful winter holiday about tyrants and time which engenders hope. My other source for optimism is the current trajectory of The Cathedral’s Racial Socialists, who might not be able to stop themselves from pushing things to a positive tipping point. Nobody likes a kapo, and that’s quickly becoming the only choice left for “Jewish” worshippers of the Leftist god. Especially as this dynamic continues:
https://bloodyshovel.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/explaining-the-cultural-revolution-signalling-arms-races-as-bad-fiat-currency/
q.v. 2015 Oscars & aftermath for proof. And of course, this:
http://dailybruin.com/2015/02/18/submission-usac-members-should-apologize-for-discriminatory-act/
Meanwhile, we are each of us one person. The darkness is coming, and we each have a choice. All we can do is know for whom and what we will fight, and why – then do it. I know. You know. Hope we can be of help to each other along the way.
If that’s for me Joe, I do intend to help. By fighting – my core product and service offering.
Fight as I listed above here. Most important part winning, but names not groups. Group slaughter of 98%+ innocents is senseless destruction of useful resources that are needed. [== part of me hates being so cold but that’s the job.
Or put another less charming – but it’s absolutely necessary to be less than charming – I’m going to play my game and not anyone else’s. As my game is open to all of Valor and/or good will regardless of their background it will tend to attract like minded and more importantly men of like deeds. And it isn’t even my game, it’s my teams game thankfully.
If nothing else I’m not going to be a Nazi or a racist because very, very clearly I’m supposed to do exactly that – along with my fellow whites. No. Not unless it’s on OUR terms. Not some Iago.
I have of course several if not many of others co-ethnics I’m bound to by loyalty and war, strife and that’s more important than any theory no matter how well researched. Social Engineering is evil enough, to mix it with guns and war [inevitable now] is a counterproductive squandering of resources especially TIME.
Remember the enemy’s goal – and I mean our Imperial Shit lords not Jews [who aren’t the enemy, they just are in the unfortunate position of overstaffing the enemy] Our Imperial Shit-lords objective is the capture of the Continental United States and it’s vast resources, unencumbered by troublesome peasants who are in the way. That’s a prize of Hundreds of Trillions. Alaska alone fair value over time [ice is melting] at least $500 Trillion. At least.
When they want your land without the people, you don’t give them an internal genocide.
Good luck to all
VXXC,
You can’t ignore that putting a vast swath of land with a myriad of local cultures under the domain of a single city is a de-facto foreign occupation. That’s not even counting the inherent evil of large centralized bureaucracy. The constitution is the source of Washington’s power (a minority in charge of a majority, no matter who occupies the position, Gnon dictates what the culture of every empire’s capital must look like) and the inevitability of a large sweeping bureaucracy. It doesn’t matter that the constitution as originally intended wasn’t an instrument of resource redistribution and was generally distant from the lives of ordinary Americans. However it established an overriding centralized power structure and a claim to demotist legitimacy. Those two things are fatal flaws that created an inevitable leftward drive to increased resource redistribution (for the good of the people) and taking advantage of the centralized power that comes with that (an ever expanding bureaucracy to dole out goods and favors).
The imperial shitlords are the inevitable product of this, they’ve merely grown more obvious and incompetent as their power base grows more unassailable. The people flux isn’t personal, it’s entirely about securing power through populist means which has been the game since laws were enacted in the name of “we the people” to get votes from people dumb/naive enough to believe it. The bar to see past the bullshit has dropped perilously low so of course our populist imperial shitlords are going to water down the populace with a more easily controlled people immersed in stupid and apathy. Pining for the days when the imperial shitlords were different, more competent and less obvious and using your people instead of the new people to water down the political process, it’s ridiculous.
The constitution stripped away local control, local sovereignty. Nothing short of dissolving the existing federal government entirely and restoring sovereignty (without demotist pretense) to localities would be enough to merely give good governance a chance. All talk of keeping groups separate is meaningless without a patchwork of small sovereign states to make is so.
List of commonly cited issues that supposedly make an supreme federal government necessary:
Duties and tariffs impeding trade, (tariffs were the favored revenue of that mercantilist era, because of demotist kabuki modern states do income taxes, but every economist worth his salt will tell you consumption tax is the way to go)
Competing currencies, (we live in an age of instantaneous market based currency exchange and non-centralized crypto-currency)
Water rights, (the solution to every issue with a commons, sell it, make every river a corporation and sell shares for ownership of the river)
Common defense, (while the bulk of national defense will go back to local militias, a mutual defense treaty could be drafted, the existing service academies including my alma mater get shut down in the process because they’re part of the decadent centralized federal bureaucracy and IHTFP, neuters foreign policy establishment without becoming defenseless, Boeing and Lockheed continue but compete locally for smaller more numerous contracts)
No head of state, (even with numerous heads of states representing each locality the iron law of oligarchy will cause a handful of them to stand out and act as de-facto head of state for their respective region when addressing foreign affairs)
Unable to enforce puritanical universalism, (different rules for different peoples, one size fits all government reduces everybody to the lowest common denominator)
I consider the entire racial angle to include Antisemitism to be a distraction and diversion, not the core problem.
That’s not gonna help you.
I want debt/derivatives erased because it’s an existential conflict driver between America and America’s ruling elites, I’m willing to let them have amnesty in exchange for Debt wipe-out because it’s less costly, not because of any silly racial sentiments either way. It certainly isn’t because I like them.
America will need all of it’s Valiant and Productive stock for there’s going to be a series of conflicts now with North America/United States at the center and focus of those wars. To wit American C/W 2, a Hemispheric challenge to North America coming from the South on land but with outside backing, and war/wars resulting from the collapse of the global American Hegemon and it’s defense of the commons and system of now hollow alliances. Obama for instance is not expending anymore American military power overseas than he absolutely has to in order to satisfy his Foreign Policy/Finance Predation constituency, these are sham and dabbling wars. 300 Marines to defeat ISIS? It’s for appearances.
He either knows or senses he needs troop strength husbanded close.
I suggest a hand be taken by all in their own fates. Begin by facing hard truths and our actual problems. Only then can we proceed with least cost [destruction] solutions.
So how is Jewishness to be defined for purposes of segregation?
Could one in a mixed marriage, both loathing mainline Ashkenazi insurgency with mixed children be permitted entry? Will Jewishness be defined by genes? By self-identiy?
Eldrick,
If you’re talking to people like VXXC, it doesn’t matter because it’s personal. Find the malefactors, target them personally, make them afraid, make them surrender or remove them, replace them with better. Repeat. Jews, like every other group, make individual choices and will be found on both sides.
The danger of fomenting ethnic war, as our current occupiers have done, is the risk it creates if a specific subgroup throws in disproportionately on the wrong side. Once the avalanche begins, history shows that the pebbles don’t get much of a vote.
The way out is, ironically, a stone-cold insistence on winning. By whatever means. That means the door is open to any offer of help from anywhere, not least because offers from outside your “expected” group radically increase the surface area your enemy must defend. The whole point of the Left’s ethnic strategy is an Ostrog approach ( http://www.slate.com/blogs/quora/2013/12/16/what_tactics_would_an_army_use_to_defeat_an_invading_mongol_force.html ), so finding allies behind the “fortification” lines becomes doubly valuable. At the same time, internal cohesion matters a lot. Both imperatives must guide our choices.
If it’s a crisis, you must treat it like one. Gnon accepts only victory. Plan accordingly.
I take the RamZPaul position on this. I believe it is just for all peoples to have a homeland where they are the majority and where they hold all the positions of influence. The Jews, the Japanese, the Serbs, the Tibetans, the Kyrgz, the Anglos. This preserves God’s rich tapestry of nations on the earth, rather than propagating the rise of ‘mixed sludge’ that we see today.
This solves the ‘Jewish question’ because Harvey Weinstein and such other degenerate Jewish influences would be promptly sent to Israel. Though I do feel it would be just desserts if at such a time the Ultra-Orthodox had formed the majority of Israeli citizens, and poor old Harvey risked a public stoning if he ever put out the kind of crap he does today.
Really, for this idea of ethnostates to rise again fully, all nations of the world must rebuke liberalism and Modernity. Won’t be too hard for the Africans, might be somewhat hard for the Asians, and we whites will have the hardest time of all. Remember: societal decay masked by technological progress and wealth abundance. Getting this pig to stop gorging is going to be murder.
We whites should be very careful of Dum-Bellum [during war] resettlement/segregation/solutions.
Most people already have homelands or enclaves, let it happen naturally. In America it’s merely necessary to allow freedom of association again. America damn well did work fine polyglot and all until madmen seized the levers 50 years ago.
Freedom of association being granted instantly in any areas no longer Cathedral controlled will do wonders for letting people work things out themselves.
It would be madness to involve the legal system in this matter. Good God at some point learn from real life.
Law is the enemy’s weapon of choice. We cannot wield it and not regret it.
Come to think of it, one of the leaders of the white victory over blacks in DC is a Jew. http://www.popville.com
If I were interested in actually winning the race AND neo-reaction war I’d study his website very carefully.
Okay, but the conclusion is incomplete.
The reason it is incomplete is two things Oliver says, that we’ve been living with the Jews for so long that it’s hard to tell where White weakness ends and Jewish subversion begins, and the challenge to historiography that the Big Lie presents, historians being used to believing that lying is done by individuals or small conspiracies.
The best book I know of about the Jewish question is Revilo Oliver’s The Jewish Strategy, also available as an audiobook by Alex Linder, but Linder interposes his own opinions in Oliver’s book.
” Mr. Moldbug is not religious, and hasn’t contributed a word to neoreaction since 2013. Mr. Boetel posts sporadically (the last time was in November), and makes a blogging out of masterfully mocking and deconstructing liberal-progressive narratives on history and current affairs. The Anti-Democracy Activist is a convert to Catholicism. Instead of the flag of Israel, he flies the flag of Rhodesia. If this here is a sinister Jewish conspiracy, it strikes me as a rather lackluster one. My Jew-dar just isn’t detecting anything. In any case, I must recommend reading all three men. And so what about the rest of the neoreactionaries? The columnists for this very neoreactionary website include one Minnesotan Catholic, one Catholic Slav, a grizzly American Southerner and three Anglo-Saxon gentiles. Zero Jews. Guest writers have included Russians, Scandinavians, and more Anglo-Saxons of various kinds. No Jews to my knowledge.”
Jewish is not a religion. It is a race/ethnicity. Judaism is a religion, but the object of the jews’ religious veneration is the jews themselves. So it’s not even a real religion,it’s just pathological narcissism.
“People may resist, but again the top elites think they know better because of their superior view of the system, so they feel entitled to continue the race-mixing manipulation of the people of the world “for their true interests, for their own good”. I know by way of practical knowledge what and how the top liberal elites think. Do you understand now that there are no evil conspiracies, lead by shifty, hand rubbing and sniggering cabal of hook nosed Jews, whose only burning motive is to destroy the White race? Anti-Jewish sentiments are counterproductive, because it traps you to emotional reactionary prison of your own making. You react to the latest outrage of the liberal Jews, and waste your time trying to find out what kind of relations Jews have with one another. Instead you should learn how the system functions, so you can analyze, understand and influence it, and thus gain real power.”
Nobody thinks it is an actual thought-out conspiracy except in a few special circumstances. White genocide is an actual planned conspiracy. Jewish statistical over-representation,devaluation of currency, and promotion of sick and obscene “values” (in reality anti-values) are a by-product of the Jewish organism. They have a natural propensity to nepotism,twisted sexual perversion,thievery, treason, and lying the same way negroes have a natural racial propensity to speak unintelligibly in any language,kill sentient and semi-sentient creatures in sadistic ways for thrills, walk directly in the middle of roads whether they are camel paths or 4-lanes, and not understand abstract concepts.
A lot of jews probably can’t understand what they’re doing to piss “the goyim” off and legitimately believe they are being persecuted. After all, the majority of them are not Ashkenazis and have an average IQ on par with a Mexican’s.Nevertheless,even if one were somehow able to explain it to them, they’d just make up a reason why it had nothing to do with them or lie and claim the opposite of what could objectively be observed was true.
That’s why it is up to usto deal with the jewish problem. And when you do that, you’re going to get called anti-semitic. Doesn’t matter how nice or reasonable or secretive you are when you do it. The jew’s first and last resort is always to cry anti-semitism.
You’re right about the need to understand exactly the nature of the beast we are dealing with,though, and in that vein I propose my first 4 sentences as a primer. You speak about the fact that those who control the functions of society rule the society. Fair enough point. The problem is that 2% of the population represents about 80% of those controlling the functions. The friends,relatives, and lackeys of the 2% fill the rest of the slots.
The enemy is a biological organism that can be identified with a DNA test. It is not a religion or an Illuminati conspiracy.That wheezing,frail,narcissistic and congenitally-insane organism is the jew.
Speaking as a weird Scandinavian-Anglo-Jew-Native hybrid who was raised in Brahmin Central, I see the Puritan (Left-Anglo) and Jewish vectors of civilizational decline as being effectively indistinguishable currently. Upper-middle class Brahmin gentiles and Jews are intermarrying to such a degree that the next generation of “Cohens” are going to come with last names like Smith and Johnson. Jews will cease to be a distinctive entity in America (disregarding the Hasidim, but they never mattered in the first place).
When America goes the way of Brazil, it’ll be with a cohesive and unitary Anglo-Jewish aristocracy.
The fact that you feel the need to censor calm, reasoned responses to your piece tells me all I need to know. Truly repugnant.
At least have the decency to correct your Nick B. Steves quote. That was NOT his conclusion, it was only one of the positions under discussion, one which he did NOT endorse. Your quote is completely misleading. He even says so above. That is not a commonly accepted NRX position.
That wasn’t Yuray. That was me. We’ve updated the commenting policy recently. Yours didn’t pass.
“Indeed, yours truly receives more traffic from Taiwan, Romania, and the United Arab Emirates than from Israel.”
Really? Either you’re getting basically zero traffic from Israel — because I don’t visit your site that often, except via way of Nick Land’s Chaos Patches — or there are others of us here in Taiwan, which really piques my interest. How many unique visitors do you get from Taiwan?
One perk of this post is finding out that I’m not the only Jew in our readership/community. I may still be the only secular Jew in these parts, though…
The main flaw in the Neoreactionary narrative regarding the Jewish Question is rooted in their labeling the incipient New World Order the “Cathedral” rather than the “Synagogue.”
The NRx crowd traces the ills of modernity back to Calvinism and stop. What they really need to do is keep going, right down to the root – and what will you find there? Judaism, the Mosaic distinction.
As it is, the “Cathedral” is very disproportionately Jewish, the modern ideologies that animate leftism are almost entirely Jewish in spirit (and mostly Jewish in genesis), and the Cathedral operates primarily to benefit Jewry – when there is a conflict between Jewish and Gentile interests in the west, it is a very rare occasion that the Jewish interests give way to the Gentile ones.
NRx focuses on a single branch of the phenotype, Calvinism, when they need to take in the whole thing – Judaism on down through Christianity, Islam, Communism, Progressivism. The core of these trends are totally Jewish, and where they started as European phenomenon, for example early Socialists like Fourier and Owen, early WASP progressives like Roosevelt, they didn’t really take off and become so exceedingly destructive and, for the white race, genocidal, until they were taken over by Jews and Jewish ideas.
Furthermore, the Jewish religion and culture is totally hostile to all Gentiles, regardless of whether they have sojourned with them. Their own holy books recount how they infiltrate and subvert states – in Egypt they got the ear of the Pharaoh and control of the grain supplies, and then stirred the “mixed multitude” up against their ruling classes when the new Pharaoh told them they had to work like everyone else. Then they slaughtered the first born (or their God did, whatever) and despoiled all their silverware. This is according to their own texts! Or what about Esther, who got the Shah of Persia she was fucking to kill 75,000 “anti-Semites” – again, this is celebrated in their own holy books!
Every Jewish holiday is a celebration of the death of Gentiles. And you may have heard of the Islamic doctrines of deceit, Taqiyya being the best-known. Those are rooted right in the Talmud, a book that Orthodox Jews still take their marching orders from today. And if you are going to tell me that Orthodox Jews (individually and collectively) don’t exercise a huge amount of interest within the global Jewish community, you are going to be laughed off.
Sure, many if not most Jews today aren’t religious, but their 3,000 year old culture will still have left a deep, and perhaps epigenetic, imprint on their collective psyche – Jews are predisposed to subversion and hatred of the Gentile order, the same way European post-Christians are prone to liberalism and suicidal tolerance. The Jews have only been out of the ghettos for 200 years.
“Every Jewish holiday is a celebration of the death of Gentiles.”
Not even close to true. Not that you care.
” And if you are going to tell me that Orthodox Jews (individually and collectively) don’t exercise a huge amount of interest within the global Jewish community, you are going to be laughed off.”
They don’t – the secular wing made quantum strides by being in America and succeeding there. Many of the Orthodox arrived post-war, and they have done well but it wasn’t the same. Israel, originally populated by a strong secular-leftist tradition, wasn’t a stronghold either. Indeed, there’s a lot of tension and hate (only valid word) between those 2 groups in Israel.
But the Orthodox will flip this script in a generation or so, and the Jewish communities of Israel and America will become a rather different place. Israel is already sliding gravitationally in their direction, as their growing influence is making the secular types more religious. New York will follow in a decade or so. Demographics are an inexorable bitch.
If winning mattered more to you than hate, Cledun, you’d stop the beta whining and pick up the golden key their example has left on the floor in front of you. It’s a program designed to run under repressive governments, in the face of very successful secular opponents, while building strong thedes, and with an eye to limiting hypergamy’s influence. It is proving itself to Gnon. It isn’t secret.
Steal the relevant parts of the code and run your own damn program fork, for fuck’s sake.
I’m in agreement with Joe on much of what he says, and in disagreement with Cledun on the Orthodox being the Villains. No they’re not, and neither are the secularists.
The secularists just borrowed the relevant parts of New England’s code for their own program fork and are now holding the bag and the blame, for New England is quite gone and indeed dead.
Daddy Bush – 91 yrs old – and James Baker will be the last WASPs.
As far as program forks I disagree with Joe, we simply need to be MEN again and masters of our own nation. Copying that program fork is a path to slavery, degradation and our own cleansing from our own lands. We have no promised land but America to seek shelter in.
Besides we already have that. We already have the bad without even a hope of good on that path.
Cledun our failures as MEN stares us in the mirror, not from under dreadlocks. Or shylocks.
We should be happy it’s someone we can beat as opposed to an aggressive enemy like the one moving up – human nature to attack weakness – from the south.
Recent Posts
Facebook
Post-Anathema
08/30/15
Friends
The Future Primaeval
Henry Dampier
Mitrailleuse
A House With No Child
Sydney Trads
Recent Comments
Archives