<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saudi Deals and Secularist Delusions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/01/30/saudi-deals-secularist-delusions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/01/30/saudi-deals-secularist-delusions/</link>
	<description>Not Your Grandfather&#039;s Conservatism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Citadel</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2015/01/30/saudi-deals-secularist-delusions/#comment-10302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Citadel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=1372#comment-10302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what is the advice here? Are we trying to save Modern secular France? 

A quote from Napoleon springs to mind.

&quot;Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.&quot;

The rise of Islam&#039;s exported barbarousness can be seen both through the lens of Judgment akin to the Babylonians relationship with Israel, but also from the standpoint that this is just one other example of Modernity&#039;s self-destructive paradox. It digs its own grave.

From the prophecy of the Age of Kali (emphasis mine):

&quot;They will be short-lived, ambitious, of little virtue, and greedy. People will follow the customs of others and be adulterated with them; PECULIAR, UNDISCIPLINED BARBARIANS will be vigorously supported by rulers. Because they go on living with perversion, they will be ruined.&quot;

Could this really be referring to any other group? Liberalism is in the process of eating itself. Obviously foreign invaders are going to be a problem in the future, but are they one we really want to tackle right now, to the aid of the Western elites? The enemy of my enemy may be a means to an end. In the words of Nick Steves, &quot;a pox on both their houses!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what is the advice here? Are we trying to save Modern secular France? </p>
<p>A quote from Napoleon springs to mind.</p>
<p>&#8220;Never interfere with an enemy while he’s in the process of destroying himself.&#8221;</p>
<p>The rise of Islam&#8217;s exported barbarousness can be seen both through the lens of Judgment akin to the Babylonians relationship with Israel, but also from the standpoint that this is just one other example of Modernity&#8217;s self-destructive paradox. It digs its own grave.</p>
<p>From the prophecy of the Age of Kali (emphasis mine):</p>
<p>&#8220;They will be short-lived, ambitious, of little virtue, and greedy. People will follow the customs of others and be adulterated with them; PECULIAR, UNDISCIPLINED BARBARIANS will be vigorously supported by rulers. Because they go on living with perversion, they will be ruined.&#8221;</p>
<p>Could this really be referring to any other group? Liberalism is in the process of eating itself. Obviously foreign invaders are going to be a problem in the future, but are they one we really want to tackle right now, to the aid of the Western elites? The enemy of my enemy may be a means to an end. In the words of Nick Steves, &#8220;a pox on both their houses!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
