<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Modernity&#8217;s Debasement Of Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/</link>
	<description>Not Your Grandfather&#039;s Conservatism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 20:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You missed two big ones.  &quot;Hero&quot;, now synonymous with &quot;victim&quot; and &quot;phobia&quot;, which briefly meant &#039;does not like&#039; and now means &#039;disagrees with&#039;.  I suspect the next step will be &#039;does not actively support&#039;.

As for words we&#039;ve lost entirely, how about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.artofmanliness.com/2013/03/11/got-thumos/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;thumos&quot;&lt;/a&gt;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You missed two big ones.  &#8220;Hero&#8221;, now synonymous with &#8220;victim&#8221; and &#8220;phobia&#8221;, which briefly meant &#8216;does not like&#8217; and now means &#8216;disagrees with&#8217;.  I suspect the next step will be &#8216;does not actively support&#8217;.</p>
<p>As for words we&#8217;ve lost entirely, how about <a href="http://www.artofmanliness.com/2013/03/11/got-thumos/" rel="nofollow">&#8220;thumos&#8221;</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mc</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Sluts&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sluts&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Yuray</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8288</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Yuray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 18:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An obvious example, but a less sinister one. We&#039;ve plenty of words for gladness -- but what will we do when we can&#039;t mention courage, spirit, justice, freedom and God?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An obvious example, but a less sinister one. We&#8217;ve plenty of words for gladness &#8212; but what will we do when we can&#8217;t mention courage, spirit, justice, freedom and God?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 07:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also consider the word Gay. In days gone by it ment Gladness, but today it refers to homosexuality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also consider the word Gay. In days gone by it ment Gladness, but today it refers to homosexuality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Glanton</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Glanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed the article, Mark. And I&#039;m glad to see we&#039;re finally getting some classy writers in this joint!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the article, Mark. And I&#8217;m glad to see we&#8217;re finally getting some classy writers in this joint!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Yuray</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8262</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Yuray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 06:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh yes, indeed. But do you notice what they&#039;ve done? They&#039;ve outlawed &quot;discrimination.&quot; They&#039;ve up and gone and outlawed &quot;accurately distinguishing!&quot; They&#039;re insane!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes, indeed. But do you notice what they&#8217;ve done? They&#8217;ve outlawed &#8220;discrimination.&#8221; They&#8217;ve up and gone and outlawed &#8220;accurately distinguishing!&#8221; They&#8217;re insane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdwardM</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EdwardM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another battered word is &quot;discriminate.&quot; Once it meant &quot;accurately to distinguish one thing from another.&quot; The Philological Branch has been hard at work on this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another battered word is &#8220;discriminate.&#8221; Once it meant &#8220;accurately to distinguish one thing from another.&#8221; The Philological Branch has been hard at work on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Yuray</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Yuray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 01:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very good observation, and precisely the phenomenon I&#039;m noticing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good observation, and precisely the phenomenon I&#8217;m noticing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 00:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points. Another word you might add to your list is &quot;love.&quot; Used to, the phrase &quot;I love you&quot; meant &quot;I am willing to make sacrifices for you.&quot; Now it means &quot;you make my genitals get large&quot;.

When the Bible says &quot;God is love.&quot; You can&#039;t tell me that the word means the same thing as when the gay protesters say &quot;love is love.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. Another word you might add to your list is &#8220;love.&#8221; Used to, the phrase &#8220;I love you&#8221; meant &#8220;I am willing to make sacrifices for you.&#8221; Now it means &#8220;you make my genitals get large&#8221;.</p>
<p>When the Bible says &#8220;God is love.&#8221; You can&#8217;t tell me that the word means the same thing as when the gay protesters say &#8220;love is love.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IA</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/12/08/modernitys-debasement-language/#comment-8246</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[IA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 20:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=989#comment-8246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really good article. Voegelin has a lot to say about this in Science, Politics and Gnosticism. Specifically, the &quot;game of masks&quot; played by modernists, or as he calls them Gnostics:

&quot;The phenomenon of the prohibition of questions is becoming clearer in its outlines. The gnostic thinker really does commit an intellectual swindle, and he knows it. One can distinguish three phases in the action of his spirit. On the surface lies the deception itself. It could be self-deception; and very often it is, when the speculation of a creative thinker has culturally degenerated and become the dogma of a mass movement. But, when the phenomenon is apprehended at its point of origin, as in Marx or Nietzsche, deeper than the deception itself will be found an awareness of it. The thinker does not lose control of himself: the &lt;i&gt;libido dominandi&lt;/i&gt; turns on its own work and wishes to master the deception as well. This gnostic turning back on itself corresponds spiritually, as we have said, to the philosophic conversion, the &lt;i&gt;periagage&lt;/i&gt; of the Platonic sense. However, the gnostic movement of the spirit does not lead to the erotic opening of the soul, but rather to the deepest reach of persistence in the deception, where revolt against God is revealed to be its motive and purpose.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good article. Voegelin has a lot to say about this in Science, Politics and Gnosticism. Specifically, the &#8220;game of masks&#8221; played by modernists, or as he calls them Gnostics:</p>
<p>&#8220;The phenomenon of the prohibition of questions is becoming clearer in its outlines. The gnostic thinker really does commit an intellectual swindle, and he knows it. One can distinguish three phases in the action of his spirit. On the surface lies the deception itself. It could be self-deception; and very often it is, when the speculation of a creative thinker has culturally degenerated and become the dogma of a mass movement. But, when the phenomenon is apprehended at its point of origin, as in Marx or Nietzsche, deeper than the deception itself will be found an awareness of it. The thinker does not lose control of himself: the <i>libido dominandi</i> turns on its own work and wishes to master the deception as well. This gnostic turning back on itself corresponds spiritually, as we have said, to the philosophic conversion, the <i>periagage</i> of the Platonic sense. However, the gnostic movement of the spirit does not lead to the erotic opening of the soul, but rather to the deepest reach of persistence in the deception, where revolt against God is revealed to be its motive and purpose.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
