Comments on: Vicious Chimp Warfare

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:10:26 +0000

I am afraid I have to agree with Exfernal.

By: Exfernal

Exfernal — Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:10:20 +0000

I read your parenthesized aside as a not particularly well veiled appeal to consequences. Does it fit with the declared dedication to truth? “Truth takes no sides”, supposedly, therefore is one of first casualties of politics.

By: John Glanton

John Glanton — Thu, 20 Nov 2014 22:22:29 +0000

Not every day I get a compliment from a personal blog hero of mine. Much appreciated! I’ll do my best to keep bellowing.

By: Kakistocracy

Kakistocracy — Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:18:35 +0000

John, I wanted to remark on what a well crafted piece this was. Enviably so.

I do believe the tribal factions are cut at a layer much deeper than “progressive” or “conservative.” This no matter the motivations of which combatants are consciously aware. Any number of examples are available, though the point being that ideology (and its bridesmaid bogeys, such as all the declaimed ‘isms) is politese over the true tribal conflict. The same one that was birthed with man and will live till he does not.

Precious few care to masticate that, though I think it is incumbent on those on the far periphery of the herd to bellow out periodically.

By: IA

IA — Thu, 20 Nov 2014 15:12:19 +0000

I like this. You left it open for pagans and christians to join together. The West has always retained paganism. That is, until about one hundred years ago. Christians need to rediscover blood and soil, and pagans need to discover grandeur in christianity.