“Now that HBD is proving the philosophies of the Confederates and the National Socialists scientifically correct, it is obvious that liberalism and egalitarianism have only prevailed through military force, censorship, and dumb luck. As the contradictions inherent in liberalism come to the fore, it is the task of reactionaries to use the weapons of liberalism — namely science — against it, to hoist the liberals on their own petard.

Unlike the liberals, we reactionaries are not and should not be restrained by humanitarian qualms. We grant no quarter to prattle about the “rights of man.” The rights of the individual are meaningless when compared to the well-being of our nation and our race. “

If there are differences (as, of course, there are) then some ethnic groups will continue to do better than others. If we deny this is due to innate differences, alternative explanations will be put forward. The current alternative explanantion for white success is that whites don’t play fair. Ought we not to expect that the idea that some ethnic groups don’t play fair to feed racist biases against them? Some might argue that biases against whites cannot have a great effect given white ‘dominance’ of society. What happens when (or if) whites become a minority? By such considerations we see that the anti-racist cannot even say that there may be differences but that we ought to ignore them to avoid feeding racist biases.