<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Practical Handbook For Deconstruction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/</link>
	<description>Not Your Grandfather&#039;s Conservatism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curia Regis</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curia Regis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this is great, and comprehensive in its reach, its extremely well thought out.  But my only criticism would be that it lacks the detail for the average neo-reactionary college student to use.  They may not be the audience, but thats where the rubber hits the road - so to speak.  It would be good if we had a way to edit these, or copy and paste variations.  Not to change the meaning of them, because they are very good alone, rather to expand them and make more verbose the arguments.  Well done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is great, and comprehensive in its reach, its extremely well thought out.  But my only criticism would be that it lacks the detail for the average neo-reactionary college student to use.  They may not be the audience, but thats where the rubber hits the road &#8211; so to speak.  It would be good if we had a way to edit these, or copy and paste variations.  Not to change the meaning of them, because they are very good alone, rather to expand them and make more verbose the arguments.  Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanguineEmpiricist</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SanguineEmpiricist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 00:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Violence and IQ are highly interrelated, from what I last recall violence peaks around 90 and virtually dissapears past a certain threshold that seems to be easily achievable with minor organizatinal effort. All attempts to discuss violence have no place without reference to this basic fact. Violence as known as typical day to day crime.

This is why serial killers who are intelligent and the Unabomber were considered so dangerous, because violence among the ultra intelligent is highly unusual. The references to testosterone while seemingly relevant are beside the point from what I understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Violence and IQ are highly interrelated, from what I last recall violence peaks around 90 and virtually dissapears past a certain threshold that seems to be easily achievable with minor organizatinal effort. All attempts to discuss violence have no place without reference to this basic fact. Violence as known as typical day to day crime.</p>
<p>This is why serial killers who are intelligent and the Unabomber were considered so dangerous, because violence among the ultra intelligent is highly unusual. The references to testosterone while seemingly relevant are beside the point from what I understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Ewing</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2393</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin Ewing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2014 20:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This so much fun to read but man do you ever have to be creative and brilliant to write this, wow!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This so much fun to read but man do you ever have to be creative and brilliant to write this, wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mlaurel</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mlaurel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 19:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You already know what I think of this, Hadley. Superb, and these examples have been a long time coming. 

I hope for many more in the future!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You already know what I think of this, Hadley. Superb, and these examples have been a long time coming. </p>
<p>I hope for many more in the future!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadley Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hadley Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 04:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is funny. I&#039;ll create a user-submitted modules section in the piece.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is funny. I&#8217;ll create a user-submitted modules section in the piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattering Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattering Matter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. People who oppose gay marriage are dumb.

2. More blacks than whites oppose gay marriage.

3. More blacks than whites are dumb.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. People who oppose gay marriage are dumb.</p>
<p>2. More blacks than whites oppose gay marriage.</p>
<p>3. More blacks than whites are dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Athlete Dying Young</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[An Athlete Dying Young]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First, the list is good by and large, and I enjoyed reading it, especially: Arbeit macht frei, mad lulz.  However, given that these are intended to win/humiliate (by whatever means), I think this list should be pinned somewhere and refined.  I have often thought that most conservatives could use a playbook to deal with the usual liberal crap.  The important thing is to reduce them to &quot;but, but, but&quot; as fast as possible.  If their ability to chain together nonsense exceeds your ability to present counterarguments through whatever means, you will lose because they and most observers are hardly qualified to judge a debate.  Going in, the average conservative is at a disadvantage insofar as they posses a sense of shame and intellectual integrity that vastly exceeds their opponent.  For that reason, I want to present a two hypothetical scenarios:

Shrill Progressive: Genetics determines height, eye color, predisposition to diseases, and predisposition to mental illnesses (gosh, this might be a lot to ask for)

You: Why think genetics is only implicated below the shoulders?

You: Genetics determines intelligence

Shrill Progressive:  XYZ anthropologist says otherwise.  (Read reviews of Wade&#039;s latest book in liberal outlets)

------------------------------------------------------

Shrill Feminist: Violence against women is never okay

You: But we should also recruit them into the armed forces and send them into combat because of equality

You: Therefore, violence against women is sometimes okay

Shrill Feminist:  B.S.  If women were in charge, there would be no wars.

Again, though, I think this is very useful so long as one understands its uses and limitations.  Even in its current form, this is a very useful resource.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the list is good by and large, and I enjoyed reading it, especially: Arbeit macht frei, mad lulz.  However, given that these are intended to win/humiliate (by whatever means), I think this list should be pinned somewhere and refined.  I have often thought that most conservatives could use a playbook to deal with the usual liberal crap.  The important thing is to reduce them to &#8220;but, but, but&#8221; as fast as possible.  If their ability to chain together nonsense exceeds your ability to present counterarguments through whatever means, you will lose because they and most observers are hardly qualified to judge a debate.  Going in, the average conservative is at a disadvantage insofar as they posses a sense of shame and intellectual integrity that vastly exceeds their opponent.  For that reason, I want to present a two hypothetical scenarios:</p>
<p>Shrill Progressive: Genetics determines height, eye color, predisposition to diseases, and predisposition to mental illnesses (gosh, this might be a lot to ask for)</p>
<p>You: Why think genetics is only implicated below the shoulders?</p>
<p>You: Genetics determines intelligence</p>
<p>Shrill Progressive:  XYZ anthropologist says otherwise.  (Read reviews of Wade&#8217;s latest book in liberal outlets)</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Shrill Feminist: Violence against women is never okay</p>
<p>You: But we should also recruit them into the armed forces and send them into combat because of equality</p>
<p>You: Therefore, violence against women is sometimes okay</p>
<p>Shrill Feminist:  B.S.  If women were in charge, there would be no wars.</p>
<p>Again, though, I think this is very useful so long as one understands its uses and limitations.  Even in its current form, this is a very useful resource.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.B Prosper</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.B Prosper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was amazing. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was amazing. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadley Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hadley Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right. I like to use them in my own case, as well. Instead of going on some circuitous route which will fall on deaf ears, anyway, I might as well bring up these pre-formulated modules and make them look ridiculous in front of everyone quickly and easily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. I like to use them in my own case, as well. Instead of going on some circuitous route which will fall on deaf ears, anyway, I might as well bring up these pre-formulated modules and make them look ridiculous in front of everyone quickly and easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobody</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/08/26/practical-handbook-deconstruction/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nobody]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=547#comment-2141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Halfway through and all I can think is &quot;I CANT WAIT TO USE THESE&quot;

Thanks. Oh my god. The Men/Women &quot;basically the same&quot; one is absolutely killer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halfway through and all I can think is &#8220;I CANT WAIT TO USE THESE&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks. Oh my god. The Men/Women &#8220;basically the same&#8221; one is absolutely killer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
