A Practical Handbook For Deconstruction
Written by Hadley Bennett Posted in Uncategorized
The point of the guide is to provide an onslaught of material efficiently packaged. Each one of these modules can be expanded out into multiple essays—books, even, but they’re sufficient for brutal effectiveness. Apply liberally. Some of them are more serious than others. Some are just plain ridiculous—don’t begrudge me my fun.
I expect not to be called out on my failure to pass the ideological turing test on some of the modules, mostly because (1) I understand I didn’t pass, and (2) the purpose of not passing is because deconstruction on multiple levels is possible, given that your opponent hasn’t even passed their own ideological turing test. If critiques shoot too far into the epistemic distance, they’ll be noteworthy, but pointless, and so not really noteworthy at all.
In other words, you can’t deconstruct on a ‘perfectly accurate level’ if they can’t comprehend what it is you’re deconstructing because they don’t fully comprehend their own ideology.
The seek admission portion is a sort of Socratic attempt to bait your interlocutor into making the wrong move, at which point there’s no going back. For a lot of the modules, I’ve found that progressives et al. will try and adopt the taxi cab fallacy—that is, wave away the initial premise when they realize it takes them somewhere unpleasant. Our version, I suppose, would be finding out the cab intends to take us directly through Anacostia. Slowly. With the windows down.
I’ll probably update this as I think of more. Of course, suggestions are welcome. Feel free to contribute in the comment box.
-Seek admission: Men are more violent than women on average, and this is because of testosterone.
Point out: Blacks have more testosterone than whites
Conclusion: Blacks on average are more violent than whites
-Seek admission: Marriage has always been heterosexual
Point out: Homosexuals trying to participate in the institution of marriage
Conclusion: This is cultural appropriation, and it is problematic
-Seek admission: Blacks have a higher crime rate than whites
Point out: No one denies this. Pre-empt their objections by saying higher black crime rates could be explained by exclusion, alienation, poverty, bad circumstances, etc.
Conclusion: Since blacks are always referred to as subjects, rather than objects, they have less agency than whites, and are thus inferior. Inferiority is an added bonus if you’re feeling adventurous
-Seek admission: Only individuals know what’s best for themselves
Point out: Individuals always choose the state—if they didn’t, and really didn’t like the state as such, the state would suffer collapse
Conclusion: That only individuals know what’s best for themselves is not always true, or the state is good for individuals
-Seek admission: Only individuals know what’s best for themselves
Point out: Necessarily, all post facto valuations cannot be equal to or higher than ex ante valuations
Conclusion: That only individuals know what’s best for themselves is not always true
-Seek admission: Men and women are basically the same
Point out: But if women were in power things are supposed to be way different—that’s the point of equal representation, after all
Conclusion: Ergo, men are different than women in very important ways, or equal representation in government is redundant
-Seek admission: Prohibiting women from working is oppression
Point out: Women are now free because they can work and pursue careers
Conclusion: Arbeit macht frei
-Seek admission: Women can fully join STEM fields, and geeks desperately want more women in their programs
Point out: Women do not join STEM fields
Conclusion: Women are weaker and much more susceptible to social criticism than men (which is what’s cited as keeping women out of STEM), or women do not prefer STEM work
-Seek admission: Men are oppressors
Point out: Women are equal to men
Conclusion: Women are oppressors
-Seek admission: Men’s opinions on rape and pregnancy will be legitimate when men can become pregnant
Point out: Women on average are not and cannot become funny (or X, Y, and Z)
Conclusion: Women’s opinions on humor are illegitimate
-Seek admission: Rape should be stopped
Point out: Only men can stop rape
Conclusion: Women aren’t good at getting things done
-Seek admission: Violence against women is never okay
Point out: But we should also recruit them into the armed forces and send them into combat because of equality
Conclusion: Therefore, violence against women is sometimes okay
-Seek admission: Government is a monopoly on violence
Point out: Monopolies reduce supply and increase prices
Conclusion: Government will result in less violence, whereas a free market in violence would increase supply and lower prices
-Seem admission: Genetics determines height, eye color, predisposition to diseases, and predisposition to mental illnesses (gosh, this might be a lot to ask for)
Point out: Why think genetics is only implicated below the shoulders?
Conclusion: Genetics determines intelligence
-Seek admission: ‘Prohibition never works’
Point out: Prohibiting nuclear reactors in residentially zoned areas is 100% effective
Conclusion: Whether prohibition works is determined on a case-by-case basis, since not all goods are fungible
-Seek admission: Animals can be bred for different attributes. That’s how we have different dog breeds, for example
Point out: Humans are animals
Conclusion: Humans can be bred for different attributes
-Seek admission: Sexuality, like homosexuality, is inborn, and so it’s okay
Point out: Pedophilia is sexuality
Conclusion: Pedophilia is inborn, and so it’s okay
-Seek admission: We’re totally inclusive, tolerant, and don’t discriminate against anyone
Point out: Inclusivism excludes exclusivism
Conclusion: Inclusivism excludes exclusivism and so is exclusivist by degree
-Seek admission: Just because you got knocked out by Mike Tyson doesn’t mean you know anything about boxing, or should be giving advice about it
Point out: You got knocked out by my dick
Conclusion: Don’t take advice from women about how to attract other women
-Seek admission: Opulence is wrong and is only befitting of Catholics
Point out: Mega churches are more opulent than Parishes
Conclusion: Protestants are worse than Catholics
-Seek admission: High suicide rate among homosexuals
Point out: Other groups with far worse persecution and societal receipt of hatred don’t have high suicide rates
Conclusion: Homosexuals really are weak and mentally fragile
-Seek admission: Africans aren’t really at fault for committing violence because of externally imposed borders
Point out: After World War I, Germany was divvied up by externally imposed borders
Conclusion: Nazis aren’t really at fault for committing violence because of the Treaty of Versailles
-Seek admission: Borders are arbitrary and meaningless because borders are not natural kinds
Point out: Property rights are not natural kinds
Conclusion: Property rights are arbitrary and meaningless
-Seek admission: Gender is totally fluid
Point out: You cannot go from homosexual to heterosexual
Conclusion: Either gender is not fluid, or you can go from homosexual to heterosexual
-Seek admission: Spontaneous orders are sticky, and so to try and get rid of them is counterproductive and often harmful, as it is a top-down imposition of an artificial order
Point out: Privilege is a spontaneous order
Conclusion: Privilege is sticky, and so to try and get rid of it is counterproductive and often harmful
-Seek admission: Gentrification is really bad because it disrupts culture
Point out: Third world immigration disrupts culture
Conclusion: Third world immigration is really bad
-Seek admission: Women do all the work in sweatshops. This must mean that men are lazy. Female power!
Point out: Sweatshop firms seek to hire docile and submissive workers, in order to maximize profit
Conclusion: Women are more docile and submissive than men
-Seek admission: For feminists, the scenario which most reliably produces convergent gender roles is the preferable scenario
Point out: Societies which have high poverty and low standards of living have the most convergent gender roles
Conclusion: Feminists want a society of high poverty and low standards of living
-Seek admission: Cochlear implants will over time result in the elimination of the deaf community
Point out: The purposeful elimination of a community is genocide
Conclusion: Sometimes genocide is good
-Seek admission: We cannot effectively constrain the state. To think so is utopian
Point out: Abolishing the state is harder than constraining the state
Conclusion: Abolishing the state is more utopian than constraining the state
-Seek admission: It would be unacceptable for women to only have one kind of lipstick to choose from
Point out: Communism reduces the vast variety of personal accessories
Conclusion: Women should oppose communism
-Seek admission: There’s no such thing as the common good
Point out: Arguing against rent-seeking and cronyism presupposes that some legislation—or lack of legislation—is for the public benefit, and some is just for the benefit of one particular company at the expense of everyone else
Conclusion: There is such a thing as the common good
-Seek admission: It is democratically legitimate for competing interests to try and raise awareness and influence the political process
Point out: The Kochs are competing interests
Conclusion: The Kochs are democratically legitimate
-Seek admission: Disrespecting or telling Native Americans not to perform their own traditions is racist and wrong
Point out: The Native Americans have cannibalistic traditions, and of course, they kill and eat meat
Conclusion: It is okay to in principle disrespect some traditions, or disrespecting or telling Native Americans not to eat humans or kill and eat meat is racist and wrong
-Seek admission: If you’re investment is at risk, you’re more likely to invest less and less often
Point out: Cohabitation without marriage comparatively puts investment at risk, and with less investment, relationships are not as happy
Conclusion: Cohabitation results in relationships that are not as happy
-Seek admission: Gays are a persecuted minority with little power
Point out: Gays are one of the highest income demographics on the planet
Conclusion: Someone is fucking lying
-Seek admission: Education alone is what makes social institutions and power dynamics remain
Point out: The patriarchy is virtually universal in almost every society
Conclusion: Women virtually universally are bad at educating people
-Seek admission: Banks lending to minorities is predatory lending.
Point out: Banks not lending to minorities is redlining and racist.
Conclusion: Banks can never not be racist. And if you can’t not be racist, then you don’t have a moral obligation to do the impossible.
-Seek admission: Jews do not control Hollywood
Point out: Jews can make sure an actor like Mel Gibson never works in Hollywood again
Conclusion: Someone is fucking lying
-Seek admission: Stereotype threat is true
Point out: This means the performance of women and minorities on tests and outcomes is completely contingent on a white man even being in the room
Conclusion:Either women and minorities innately perform poorly on tests, or women and minorities have less agency than white men, since they are always acted upon, rather than actors, and they are innately incapable of taking control of their own situation
-Seek admission: Feminism as we know it arose out of western culture
Point out: Immigration will gradually eliminate western culture
Conclusion: Immigration will gradually eliminate feminism
-Seek admission: The death of millions in concentration camps is a refutation of Nazism
Point out: Millions have died from unnecessary bombings from liberal regimes
Conclusion: Liberalism is a refuted ideology
-Seek admission: Cultural diversity is a great thing
Point out: Culture doesn’t exist, you xenophobe
Conclusion: Cultural diversity is not a great thing because for something to be a great thing, it has to exist
User-submitted modules:
-Seek admission: People who oppose gay marriage are dumb.
Point out: More blacks than whites oppose gay marriage.
Conclusion: More blacks than whites are dumb.
Halfway through and all I can think is “I CANT WAIT TO USE THESE”
Thanks. Oh my god. The Men/Women “basically the same” one is absolutely killer
Right. I like to use them in my own case, as well. Instead of going on some circuitous route which will fall on deaf ears, anyway, I might as well bring up these pre-formulated modules and make them look ridiculous in front of everyone quickly and easily.
That was amazing. Thanks.
First, the list is good by and large, and I enjoyed reading it, especially: Arbeit macht frei, mad lulz. However, given that these are intended to win/humiliate (by whatever means), I think this list should be pinned somewhere and refined. I have often thought that most conservatives could use a playbook to deal with the usual liberal crap. The important thing is to reduce them to “but, but, but” as fast as possible. If their ability to chain together nonsense exceeds your ability to present counterarguments through whatever means, you will lose because they and most observers are hardly qualified to judge a debate. Going in, the average conservative is at a disadvantage insofar as they posses a sense of shame and intellectual integrity that vastly exceeds their opponent. For that reason, I want to present a two hypothetical scenarios:
Shrill Progressive: Genetics determines height, eye color, predisposition to diseases, and predisposition to mental illnesses (gosh, this might be a lot to ask for)
You: Why think genetics is only implicated below the shoulders?
You: Genetics determines intelligence
Shrill Progressive: XYZ anthropologist says otherwise. (Read reviews of Wade’s latest book in liberal outlets)
——————————————————
Shrill Feminist: Violence against women is never okay
You: But we should also recruit them into the armed forces and send them into combat because of equality
You: Therefore, violence against women is sometimes okay
Shrill Feminist: B.S. If women were in charge, there would be no wars.
Again, though, I think this is very useful so long as one understands its uses and limitations. Even in its current form, this is a very useful resource.
1. People who oppose gay marriage are dumb.
2. More blacks than whites oppose gay marriage.
3. More blacks than whites are dumb.
This is funny. I’ll create a user-submitted modules section in the piece.
You already know what I think of this, Hadley. Superb, and these examples have been a long time coming.
I hope for many more in the future!
This so much fun to read but man do you ever have to be creative and brilliant to write this, wow!
Violence and IQ are highly interrelated, from what I last recall violence peaks around 90 and virtually dissapears past a certain threshold that seems to be easily achievable with minor organizatinal effort. All attempts to discuss violence have no place without reference to this basic fact. Violence as known as typical day to day crime.
This is why serial killers who are intelligent and the Unabomber were considered so dangerous, because violence among the ultra intelligent is highly unusual. The references to testosterone while seemingly relevant are beside the point from what I understand.
I think this is great, and comprehensive in its reach, its extremely well thought out. But my only criticism would be that it lacks the detail for the average neo-reactionary college student to use. They may not be the audience, but thats where the rubber hits the road – so to speak. It would be good if we had a way to edit these, or copy and paste variations. Not to change the meaning of them, because they are very good alone, rather to expand them and make more verbose the arguments. Well done.
Recent Posts
Facebook
Post-Anathema
08/30/15
Friends
The Future Primaeval
Henry Dampier
Mitrailleuse
A House With No Child
Sydney Trads
Recent Comments
Archives