<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Limits of Sympathy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/</link>
	<description>Not Your Grandfather&#039;s Conservatism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 20:20:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.7</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Reaction &#124; The Reactivity Place</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[This Week in Reaction &#124; The Reactivity Place]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 06:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=120#comment-186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Laliberte pens The (Heart)Broken Society; Bennet on how Mises was wrong about value; Glanton on the Limits of Sympathy (or empathy or both); Dampier on the economics of eroding social trust; and fresh of the [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Laliberte pens The (Heart)Broken Society; Bennet on how Mises was wrong about value; Glanton on the Limits of Sympathy (or empathy or both); Dampier on the economics of eroding social trust; and fresh of the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JPOutlook</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JPOutlook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 20:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=120#comment-165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed. A properly focused sympathy is a virtue, however. 

How to focus it? Well, that might be the more difficult part... You could start by paying attention to tradition and not fads. Even listening to the Church and encouraging her in her traditionalism. They don&#039;t call it the Good Book and they don&#039;t call it Wisdom for no reason...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. A properly focused sympathy is a virtue, however. </p>
<p>How to focus it? Well, that might be the more difficult part&#8230; You could start by paying attention to tradition and not fads. Even listening to the Church and encouraging her in her traditionalism. They don&#8217;t call it the Good Book and they don&#8217;t call it Wisdom for no reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Yuray</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Yuray]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=120#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice article, as usual. Glanton has a very readable style of writing. Social Matter is beginning to strike me as  a TakiMag of reaction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, as usual. Glanton has a very readable style of writing. Social Matter is beginning to strike me as  a TakiMag of reaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Glanton</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Glanton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 19:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=120#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, damn. You&#039;re right about my word choice. Rookie maneuver on my part. The rest of your comment is spot on as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, damn. You&#8217;re right about my word choice. Rookie maneuver on my part. The rest of your comment is spot on as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xpat Player</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xpat Player]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=120#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article by John, as expected. I only have one tiny bone to pick, however. I believe you are talking about sympathy, not empathy.

These people are taught to sympathize with the weak. If they had empathy, they would understand where Boko Haram&#039;s standpoint came from. They would understand why there is &quot;homophobia&quot; within the NFL. 

Empathy is a developed trait - understanding enemies and friends alike. Sympathy, on the other hand, is an inherent trait. Don&#039;t we all feel sorry for those worse off than us? 

That is the key difference -  empathy is understanding and logic. Sympathy is feeling and emotion. I agree with the core tenet of this article, which is to reduce sympathy. My corollary would be to raise empathy. Instead of eliminating each and every enemy,  we need to understand them and where they come from.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article by John, as expected. I only have one tiny bone to pick, however. I believe you are talking about sympathy, not empathy.</p>
<p>These people are taught to sympathize with the weak. If they had empathy, they would understand where Boko Haram&#8217;s standpoint came from. They would understand why there is &#8220;homophobia&#8221; within the NFL. </p>
<p>Empathy is a developed trait &#8211; understanding enemies and friends alike. Sympathy, on the other hand, is an inherent trait. Don&#8217;t we all feel sorry for those worse off than us? </p>
<p>That is the key difference &#8211;  empathy is understanding and logic. Sympathy is feeling and emotion. I agree with the core tenet of this article, which is to reduce sympathy. My corollary would be to raise empathy. Instead of eliminating each and every enemy,  we need to understand them and where they come from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Limits of Empathy &#124; Reaction Times</title>
		<link>http://www.socialmatter.net/2014/05/14/the-limits-of-empathy/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Limits of Empathy &#124; Reaction Times]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 17:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialmatter.net/?p=120#comment-151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] By John Glanton [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] By John Glanton [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
